I wrote it in about an hour and a half. It seems to work in Python 3.6 and 3.12. Now you never need to write another double-underscore magic method again.
hCaptcha.com has a "privacy pass", where if you create a user at hCaptcha.com, you can get passes to bypass the captcha itself (because you've already verified through other methods). This is not often used, because guess what? Not many people were bothered by captchas enough to create a user, because no one wants to create another user and be tracked (via privacy pass, across captcha-protected sites) through their user. This was mostly used by disabled users who couldn't pass hCaptcha's offerings.
Personally, I'm not interested in "logging in" or passing my "realness" via API from my device(s), as that's just another token to track an individual and their behaviors. Which is also why I haven't created any user for privacy pass myself, and would generally recommend that you not do so in any Apple, Google, etc., related system (not even hCaptcha, unless you're disabled and can't do the captcha itself).
I don't know what hCaptcha is doing nowadays.
But unless you're disabled, I wouldn't sign up or agree to pass this information from Apple, Google, etc.
> Are there not "ML techniques" for visual captchas too?
There are.
> how long do you think that is going to last?
I don't know. So far it hasn't been difficult to recognize the garbage traffic when we take the time to look. And attackers always make it easier by releasing github source and / or announcing their results on Twitter.
ETA: two different people have tested on Chrome and Safari on iPhone 6S locally, and can't reproduce. Please take a screenshot and provide more information to: https://www.hcaptcha.com/reporting-bugs if you want to get this fixed.
Hi! I work at hCaptcha (we handle the CF captchas), and to respond specifically: audio is inaccessible for those with visual and auditory processing issues, as well as being broken by ML techniques. Not to project, but we suspect this is why Google turns it off if your browser looks at all suspicious.
While Privacy Pass is not perfect, we are working towards getting better. I'm not in the product flow for accessibility, but if you have ideas outside of audio that you believe would be able to distinguish between yourself and a robot, I'd be happy to discuss via email to ensure that we can get a solution for you and anyone who can reasonably interact with a computer.
I work at hCaptcha, we run CF's captcha. If you're having problems in the future, popping open a debugger and capturing the results can help us figure out what's going on. But also: browser, OS, site, ...?
Right now: there is an issue with Safari users on the most recent iOS and OS X, where 3rd party cookies have now been disabled by default. We're working on a solution.
If that's your issue, you can fix on your side in the short-term by not using Safari, or by enabling 3rd party cookies.
Basically every family of 2+ adults have 2+ jobs in order to make things work today. Not 1, like the 50's when taxes on the wealthy was high, but 2+. More adults live at home today than ever before. We're in the worst job market in aggregate, as all real wages for the middle class are below starvation-level.
> I bet it doesn't have to cost that much to lock people up.
You are talking out of your ass. If you can do better, then run a business housing prisoners, and make a pile of money. Instead, you've provided literally nothing to the conversation aside from "things can't be that bad, these are bad people".
You've got no information, you've just got bad, hurtful, and hateful opinions. Take a class or read a book on social justice, find a way out of your edgelord shitposting. I'm done wasting my time on you.
So give them that chance to say no. Right now, you're advocating for paying $81k/year (average for CA prisons) to keep people in prison, instead of trying to fix the underlying causes. Estimates put the number of homeless people in California at roughly 120k+, including families, children, etc.
So if we solve the problem as you are proposing, by putting them in prison right now, that's $9.7 billion / year. It would more than double the current California prison population, from current 115k people, to 235k+, and we'd need new child prisons, because a lot of those homeless folks are families with children.
Putting "vagrants" and other "homeless" people in prison is stupidly expensive, pointlessly punitive, and doesn't solve the underlying economic or social problems. It doesn't stop people from being poor, it just makes being poor suck worse than it already does. All you've done is put a bunch of vulnerable people in prison.
> When someone commits a crime, we call him a criminal and remove him from society for a while.
Wow. I've received 3 speeding tickets, and 2 right on red tickets in my life. I committed a crime. I paid fines. I was not removed from society.
That is the case with a huge number of crimes, today, otherwise we would have an even worse prison problem.
> I see no reason to abandon this tradition now.
We've already abandoned it, and we are reducing the sizes of prisons as you prattle on about the problems of vagrancy.
Let's get mental health care facilities, rehab, and more, to the levels that existed before Republicans gutted them starting in the 50's. I don't know, like institute new-deal type things so people aren't wanting for basic needs, and maybe vagrancy will go away.
Well, it did the last time we did that.
Why wouldn't we do the exact same thing that worked last time?
Take a deep breath.