“Antiracist” doesn’t mean “not racist”; it’s a Marxist ideology focusing on racial identities and purposeful systemic racism to “balance” the power between racial tribes.
It’s extremely racist.
Anti-Asian racism will become normalized as long as “antiracism” is part of the Democratic agenda. They’re literally fighting to overturn civil rights laws in CA and WA so the government can discriminate based on race again.
GP talked about using Docker to do complex single host deployments until they needed horizontal scaling, which given max VM power, is after they can afford someone to manage it for them.
That makes me think they have multiple services of variable workload packed onto a single host, eg web server, async, and DB all on a single host via Docker.
That’s the antithesis of EB, which can only do horizontal scaling. Docker provides a way to replicate those multiple services in a deployment configuration when you want to set up a host image.
Not using Docker as an easy way to pack it all onto a single box as long as they can is just wasted expense.
Running a cluster across your IOT fleet (1k+ devices; 5-10 apps each) gives a nice interface for pushing out tasks, choosing applications for a device, configuring supervisor-device relationships, etc. It turns out from scratch Docker containers on ARM are very portable.
I think you’re being dramatic — embedded is notorious for crazy builds of weird config flags to even get “hello world” to compile, and you’re waving your arms pretending that concepts from Erlang abstracted away from the language are too much.
Docker is just cgroups and namespaces, with a zip file of code. More or less literally.
Orchestration is the same mess it’s always been — back to at least the telephone days, when Erlang used the same concepts.
The difference is that institutional misandry is okay in 2021.
For at least the last decade, the “feminist” movement in Western countries has been a force for misandry, not equality.
Arguably, the feminist movement in education has been a force for misandry since women became the educational majority in the 1980s and feminism in education became a sexist power movement by the majority in education.
That seems true of structural components but untrue of silicon, where the heat output difference is literally the GPU being jiggled more aggressively inside by the miner.
Heat dissipation is due to jiggling the tiny gates a little every time you fire one: which cycle much more often in the mining case — at a higher temperature, where there’s more likely to be damage.
My experience is that you get small gains (eg, 10-100M) but you see an uptick in similarly sized faults (eg, tax audits or plane defects) and then go negative on the occasional preventable disaster (eg, 737 MAX). Edit: this is different than being beneficial for some employee at the employer — ie, it probably improves some VPs bonus even though it’s negative for the company, overall.
Then you have the various examples that succeeded by treating workers well — Ford, Avis, Boeing, etc.
I’m curious how you’re comparing companies to reach that conclusion.
Younger workers have less to lose, so tend to leave more — but they’re also less experienced and tend to have lower expectations for the workplace.
Older workers are less likely to leave because it’s disruptive, but they’re also more experienced at the political side of life — and tend to insist on things like reasonable hours, professional management, etc.
My personal stance is that trying to exploit your workers is a losing game — but from the employers who act that way...
There’s some who prefer the lower expectations (eg, Amazon) and some who prefer the more stable crew (eg, ATT).
The realization at the end of your post is what the author is trying to get people to reach about software.
The category theory for programmers crowd argue that categorical diagrams (annotated graphs) are the right way to reason about software to gain insights — and the rest is describing the equivalence between functions in a type theory and maps in a category.
Your mental model of directed graphs is a functional model.
You don’t like the data, so you accuse the model of being biased (even though it’s accurate) and insist that you get to apply your own personal biases based on how you think races should look and interact?
Racial correlation isn’t racial bias.
In what way is viewing the world through a lens of racism useful?
Theorem: my bathroom has achieved quantum supremacy, greater than any current industry system.
Proof:
- No current super computer can accurately (much less real time) model an hour long high fidelity video of my bathtub full of water set into motion by jiggling my foot against it.
- No current quantum computer can accelerate a problem of that size.
Let me know when quantum computing is more than triviality in expensive components.
I would argue that the media has become such a rabid monoculture representing only 8% of the population that it has lost the ability to manufacture consent, broadly.
Disney has fallen so far that they failed to tell A Hero’s Journey in the latest Star Wars— and come across to most long time fans as A Villain’s Rise. The same can be said for Captain Marvel. Heck, even Wonder Woman raped a guy in the latest movie.
Yes.
“Antiracist” doesn’t mean “not racist”; it’s a Marxist ideology focusing on racial identities and purposeful systemic racism to “balance” the power between racial tribes.
It’s extremely racist.
Anti-Asian racism will become normalized as long as “antiracism” is part of the Democratic agenda. They’re literally fighting to overturn civil rights laws in CA and WA so the government can discriminate based on race again.