Senator "series of tubes" Stevens convicted on 7 felony counts(politico.com)
politico.com
Senator "series of tubes" Stevens convicted on 7 felony counts
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1008/14819.html
6 comments
Maybe soon he'll discover that a prison isn't a big building: it's a series of cubes.
Did you come up w/ that joke on your own? I ask because it's awfully similar to a highly moderated comment left on /.
http://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1009471&cid=2553...
If you borrowed it from /., I would imagine that giving credit to the creator (who happens to be "Anonymous Coward" in this case) would be appropriate.
http://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1009471&cid=2553...
If you borrowed it from /., I would imagine that giving credit to the creator (who happens to be "Anonymous Coward" in this case) would be appropriate.
I think I remember seeing it on Fark, and I wouldn't be surprised if that guy took it from Slashdot, who then probably took it from a blog somewhere...
You see, the legal system is just a series of tubes. It's not a big truck! If you put me into it I will just clog up the whole thing.
[deleted]
How do idiots like this get reelected for forty years?
You know how people have been talking the past couple months about how Alaska gets more federal money per capita than any other state? That's Stevens. What you call pork, locals call boosting the local economy.
It's the same reason why Congress is at a 12% approval rating yet most incumbents have no trouble keeping their seats. Everyone thinks their Representative and Senators are great, it's all the others that are crooks.
It's the same reason why Congress is at a 12% approval rating yet most incumbents have no trouble keeping their seats. Everyone thinks their Representative and Senators are great, it's all the others that are crooks.
It's the same state that made Palin their governor.
Look around you.
It's the people.
Dumb and ignorant.
Not that there aren't plenty of dumb people around, but the ignorance part is practically unavoidable. Even smart people have little incentive to be well-informed when there are a large number of voters. This "rational ignorance" is a basic defect of democracy.
Sounds like the Richard Feynman stories about sitting on the board that chose the math/physics books for highschool students. He was the only one reading them while the others were just judging the book by the cover or what the publisher had said. It just goes to show that even brilliance can be overruled.
so is systematic irrationality. Turns out that according to polls, people has systematically irrational beliefs when it comes to voting (probably because they have no immediate personal stake). Poll here: http://www.kff.org/kaiserpolls/1199-econgen.cfm
Err, hmm?
http://www.kff.org/kaiserpolls/1199-econgen3.cfm
58 percent of the general public think that tax cuts are good for the economy, while 37 percent of economists do. So, the lesson learned is.....the general public is more qualified to set policy than experts.
http://www.kff.org/kaiserpolls/1199-econgen3.cfm
58 percent of the general public think that tax cuts are good for the economy, while 37 percent of economists do. So, the lesson learned is.....the general public is more qualified to set policy than experts.
Uh, whoa? Tax cuts in the United States are generally done without corresponding decreases in spending, leading to a massive deficit, leading to an unpayably large national debt.
You can't simply say 'tax cuts are good' and call it a day- that's a gross oversimplification. "Tax cuts are good when accompanied by a decrease in government spending such as that we have a large surplus" I can agree with.
You can't simply say 'tax cuts are good' and call it a day- that's a gross oversimplification. "Tax cuts are good when accompanied by a decrease in government spending such as that we have a large surplus" I can agree with.
I don't even want to agree with that. The function of government is to provide essential services to society, and I don't think you can just say that it's better for the economy if you cut spending so it doesn't. I doubt the economy would be improved in a total anarchy, which is essentially your suggestion seen to its ultimate conclusion.
For example, even the Economist agrees that a market economy won't function without clear rules that everyone plays by. And they are also of the opinion that carbon taxes are better than cap-and-trade, because taxes provide better long-term stability so businesses are able to plan and adapt.
For example, even the Economist agrees that a market economy won't function without clear rules that everyone plays by. And they are also of the opinion that carbon taxes are better than cap-and-trade, because taxes provide better long-term stability so businesses are able to plan and adapt.
Economists are often consulted by politicians wrt govt spending, so they have a more specific interest in govt funding. Average Joes may see a benefit or two but every paycheck has deductions, so they have a different interest.
Karma.
As usual, I'm amazed at how cheap it is to buy off our Congressmen. Abramoff was sentenced for picking up a few $100 restaurant tabs. Now Stevens is heading to jail over things like a free massage chair and work done on his house.
With the price so cheap, I wonder if I should look at buying my own Congressman as an investment opportunity? I'm sure I could think of useful things for him to do.
With the price so cheap, I wonder if I should look at buying my own Congressman as an investment opportunity? I'm sure I could think of useful things for him to do.
I think the reason we see these guys getting caught for $100 tabs is because they get sloppy. There were probably millions in kickbacks which they were able to hide properly because they took the effort to do it right. But a $100 kickback by comparison gets overlooked as an insignificant amount
+1 Insightful, mod parent up
(no, seriously, this is a really important point)
(no, seriously, this is a really important point)
Why the downvotes?
There are no special people with moderator points in HN, it is pointless to beg.
I'm not asking for me, I'm asking about the post above mine...well, whatever.
While I whole-heartedly agree, I do feel the need to point out that quality massage chairs aren't even remotely "cheap" by any standard.... if they were, I'd be sitting on one right now! :D