They point to their comparison page to claim similar quality. First off it's very clear that the details are way less, but worse, look at the example "Three-quarters front view of a yellow 2017 Corvette coming around a curve in a mountain road and looking over a green valley on a cloudy day."
The Original model shows the FRONT, the speed version shows the BACK of the corvette. It's a completely different picture. This is not similar but strikingly different.
What strikes me is the comment on 3DS challenges that passed.
By law in Europe, once 3DS challenge is completed the Bank owns the risk and cost of the chargeback NOT the Online Shop. Can someone tell me how this is implemented in common processors ? Any experience?
What strikes me in this "comments/rebuttals" is that they mostly miss Moxies' main points and underlying critic. Some comments are pretty obvious and certainly understood my moxie...
In a recent letter, the CNPD further clarified their argument as to why they don't investigate the several breaches of the GDPR (Legal Basis, Purpose, Transfer, EU Representative) for thousands of Luxemburgish (and hundred thousands of European) citizens. Highlights are mine.
Your data is wrong. You estimate 10% of all tests are positive in Luxembourg. That's utter BS. We have tested more poeple than our population and have done multiple testing. The quote is around 1-2% and not 10% as you claim.
OP here - That's the point. They are not a data controller by that very simple fact. They are processing this data on an illegal basis. Any lawyer around that want to assist me suing in the US?
By now you should know about the EUJC ruling on the Privacy Shield. I am going to keep this one short and sweet - I believe the judgment to be more far-reaching than NOYB is explaining on their website. The reasoning is very simple.