Not irrelevant at all, military technology is a large part of the UK's tech sector, and arms exports to countries with poor human rights records are in the billions.
"4.5 million UK tourists" is not the same as total passengers. Individual tourists can make multiple journeys, and overseas tourists are excluded from this figure. Over 20 million passengers use the tunnel annually.
The same is true for Android development - we saw build times cut in half after upgrading to M1 machines. Another advantage is that there is no noticeable slowdown while Gradle does its thing, so multitasking is now significantly easier.
On the contrary, television advertisements have (rightly) always been viewed as inextricably linked to the content they appear between. As such, advertiser boycotts have been a favoured tactic of conservative organisations throughout the past few decades. For example, from 1982:
> For the second time within a year, the Coalition for Better Television is threatening a boycott of one or more companies that advertise on prime-time television, but this time without the support of its most prominent member, the Moral Majority.
> A wealthy black person can easily start their own business.
Certainly, but black people are disproportionately less wealthy than white people, so are far less likely to be in that position.
> A poor white person cannot use their whiteness to pay the bills.
This is also true, but they will not face the structural racial discrimination that a black person of their socio-economic standing would.
The trouble with reducing issues of inequality to class alone is that it obscures the systemic biases that make it easier for white dudes to become rich in the first place.
The problem with "rich people" as a phrase is that most rich people don't think of themselves as rich - for example, only 13% of millionaires do [1]. As "white dudes" are disproportionately represented within this demographic, I think the inclusion of these qualifiers helps to illustrate the point.