Hire a designer - the UI and UX could use some work. Here's some of the design feedback I'd give you:
- You're not utilizing the whole width of the page, and the table looks pretty compressed, making it difficult to read.
- You're also not using the whole height of the page. The pagination would be more useful if there was more content. It's silly to waste that much real estate.
- The icons in the top right are too small and the third (mailing list) carries no meaning.
- Your logo in the navbar is too small, or at least the text. You probably don't need the text in the logo if you've got the heading there.
- Search is in a pretty unintuitive location - try putting it in the top right of the layout.
Edit: From a functional perspective, you've got duplicated stories on the home page currently. Same exact link, two different titles.
Wire transfers often are not able to be undone once they happen (and are accepted by the other bank). This is the reason why there's so much verification that happens in wire transfers. (I helped develop 2nd factor authentication used for authenticating wire transfers for a financial company)
Sweet! I wonder if there's a way to gauge public opinion on these links - one of the apps obviously has some awful reviews on iTunes (Vapor). It'd help keep people away from apps that are doing malicious things like stealing contacts and uploading them to their servers.
A link to where the item was mentioned would be cool too, in addition to popping up the mention.
I wonder if they realize how unreadable those posts are - they look like mindless ramblings. It took me a few minutes to realize it was an interview/chat.
While my credit union also fails on this, I'm not a fan of drop-down menus for navigation. The gold standard for UX/UI as far as banking is concerned is Simple. https://simple.com/
Probably just for historical reasons. The size of the layout is small enough to fit on a 1024x768 display. When that was the primary resolution targeted by web developers, they tried to cram everything into the top left corner, as this does.
FWIW, my credit union's website isn't too bad. They've started to redesign and use newer web technologies and approaches. https://www.americafirst.com/
The site itself is a bit weird. Most of the content looks like it's loaded in via AJAX, and on a slower connection it's pretty jarring. Clicking on "See All" initially shows the "About Us" section of the page, which caused me to think I clicked the wrong link, and went back. It wasn't until I clicked it again that I noticed what was going on. At least throw some kind of AJAX spinner/placeholder or indicator that the page content is still loading.
It's already been pointed out that the Verge ignored several important pieces of the ToS when writing that article - take a look at the comments both on HN (for other articles) and The Verge to see.
- You're not utilizing the whole width of the page, and the table looks pretty compressed, making it difficult to read.
- You're also not using the whole height of the page. The pagination would be more useful if there was more content. It's silly to waste that much real estate.
- The icons in the top right are too small and the third (mailing list) carries no meaning.
- Your logo in the navbar is too small, or at least the text. You probably don't need the text in the logo if you've got the heading there.
- Search is in a pretty unintuitive location - try putting it in the top right of the layout.
Edit: From a functional perspective, you've got duplicated stories on the home page currently. Same exact link, two different titles.