I think we can name the science part of computer science "algorithmic science" (or something to the same effect) and the engineering part "computer engineering" and call it a day.
Exactly my thoughts. Reading all the quotes on Gawker, I fail to see how they arrived at the conclusion that PG's implying that one needs to be male in order to be a good programer.
I see a few points being made ("out of context"):
- You want to start programming at 13 to be a hacker.
- 13 year old girls are not interested in programming.
- PG doesn't know how to make programming more attractive to this group.
As far as I can tell these are neutral observations and opinions. Even if his statement is plainly incorrect, simply being wrong doesn't make it offensive.
I think we can name the science part of computer science "algorithmic science" (or something to the same effect) and the engineering part "computer engineering" and call it a day.