Those don't look like actual classification markings, which are required to appear at both the top and bottom of pages. It seems more likely that those are some internal Democratic party markings. Also the fact that the documents seem to be talking about the first 100 days in the future tense would point to them being planning documents produced by people in the party.
This whole line of argument presupposes that there is some sort of magic ratio of nutrients for each person and that if they don't hit exactly those numbers they will suffer some vague disastrous consequences (coughing a lot from eating too much pizza and mac-and-cheese?).
Our metabolisms are way more adaptable than that. Generally if you're even in the right ballpark you are fine. There's clearly no exact optimal diet (even at an individualized level). If it were this way people would be keeling over left and right.
Modeling it as a parallel plate capacitor with a mica dielectric is basically totally ignoring the part about it being a supercapacitor. He may as well have been seeing if it would be feasible to get to the moon using a wood fired rocket.
I wrote some code a little while ago to do something like this (although I wasn't trying to produce Victory Boogie Woogie in particular)[1]. It generates samples from a probability distribution over kd-trees called the Mondrian Process [2]
However the driver lives in New Jersey, where only 10% of the power comes from coal (as of 2005). There, I find that it is only 0.713 lbs of CO2 per kwh, so he'd only be releasing about 1.5 tons of CO2.
Regardless of what they paid, its already been spent and its likely that Facebook did not see much of that anyway. Even if they were to move to another social network out of spite they'd still have to pay that acquisition cost again and more since that network will be much smaller making it harder to drive more likes/follows/whatevers there.
Is it just me or does $3000 seem like a really cheap price for the Dallas Mavericks to reach 1M+ fans? Would it make any significant difference to their marketing budget if the price were cut to $1000 or doubled to $6000?
I'm not really sure that this explains it at all. For one, there are sites similar to isitruby19.com - such as onpython3yet.com. What seems more likely to me is that python 3 was not as compelling of an upgrade until recently since a lot of stuff was back ported to 2.7. I don't know as much about ruby 1.9, but it is also seems possible that python 3 was simply more disruptive of a change.
Somewhat off the beaten path for this site I know, but the process seemed oddly similar to software development to me as well as simply amazing that you can create something that polished from dirt.
Pretty cool. Google authenticator is another alternative that be used via a pam module, with the additional benefit that it doesn't need to connect to something else for verification.
This article article is ridiculous. He acts as if alternative energy sources must be cheaper than our current energy sources to be worthwhile. Of course alternative energy sources cost less, if they didn't we wouldn't be having this discussion. There would not be much of a need to worry about co2 emissions.
But in fact we do live in a world where co2 emissions are an issue. The author more or less acknowledges this and then simply ignores it. What exactly is he proposing as an alternative? Nothing. If we are to avoid the worst effects of global warming we're going to have to pay a price.
Solar module prices have dropped 50% over the last decade. Working backward from the numbers on solarbuzz that would mean that a residential scale system's price has dropped 25%.
And by cherry picking the prices for a residential scale installation (28.9 / 63.1 cents per kwh) he ignores the fact that industrial scale systems are much closer to parity. The price for these systems is half of that 15.15 / 33.3. And these numbers have been declining. While the age of mass scale decentralized solar generation may not be here yet, the age of solar may be here much sooner than the author would like to admit.
Carol's measurements would destroy the entanglement in a way that Alice and Bob would be able to detect. However QKD is still vulnerable to a MITM (as opposed to mere interception). You would still need some sort of a mechanism so that Alice knows she's talking to Bob and vice-versa.
RBAC appears to be a bit richer of a concept than group based authentication. In particular, role assignments can be session dependent and role assignments can be constrained to live in a particular hierarchy. The latter is useful for situations where you want to make it possible for a user to have role A or role B but not both at once.
Edit: Just to add, the key thing that they appear to be bragging about is that they use RBAC to grant the user logged into the system console the "Console User" profile which by default has permissions to modify printers and wireless connections. Once you have this role, you don't not need to authenticate further.