(Yo, Elon: I’m trying to increase the fertility rate. Childcare for 3 small children is six thousand dollars a month here in California. Do I have to go into the office all five days this week? Why not four?)
This is just ripe for a response "leave California". Which Elon likes to bite on. But it's expensive everywhere and not just that, fundamentally time with your child is important and cannot be fixed by throwing money at it.
I know this isn't about Elon's hypocritical stance on fertility, sorry.
The left is focused not on the correct thing (albeit a thing worthy of support), and the right refuse to acknowledge the benefit of regulation / legislation and are totally disenchanted with the possibility of politics while they just just blame the left for all their problems.
I would really like this content to be an essay, not a story. Or I should say, the narrative feels like an essay but it turns out not to be.
Namely, (spoiler) he finds some schematics in the door that would have informed his analysis prior. The fact he didn't just say, "hey you might have this in your door and could be helpful,..." And then proceed to do the analysis with the full information provided from the data.
Secondly, the purging test only compares hot water and "cold" water, and doesn't actually test the duration to get hot water to temperature. That is, is the 25s it takes to get up to temp matter? From the timings in the video it does, but it just felt like he was comparing purging and not, instead of hot water vs cold water.
Thirdly, hows do these advice change for newer models? Surely the dishwasher companies know some of this and can make things better.
I will be taking some of this practices to my dishwasher, but it is a newer Bosch model, and I would imagine I need to do some research to understand what is applicable to my dishwasher.
I don't think "master" is as difficult as it's been described. In fact I found it much easier than expert. Finding a "key" row, filling in that, and continuing in a direct style was often the solution. I think this needs more depth to be a really good puzzle game, but it is on the right track.
My kids are 9 and 6 and the older is impulsive/adhd, so I am very careful with her. She used to want to watch kids playing with toys / unboxing videos when they were in vogue years ago and I shut that down quickly. I want her to play with those things, not watch someone else.
We allow a <2hours of screentime a day; TV or Chromebook. But it's mostly the former.
I have adguard at home where I sheepishly block things when they find sites I don't like and they use their schools Chromebooks at home which already is pretty restrictive. Only Roblox on the tablet.
Their friends have smart phones, which I find abhorrent. Although her friends are breaking them and parents are just not replacing them, so at this point it's moot. The unrestrictive iPad time I hear from her that other kids get is annoying and won't happen here.
The path to that end has many solutions, and the methods to obtain that value are overdetermined. Long term or short term outlooks and nuances between. Cost-benefit analysis paired with changing technology and political landscapes, along with different definitions of what value is and how to go about creating it.
F# obviously approves |>, but in my software project that has been continually maintained for ten years, we introduced -->. Now re-factoring our project we use |>. It kind of messes with my sight against pattern matching in OCaml though.
It's going to be tough to convince every app developer to have their applications work in those circumstances. I would imagine some permissions which are core to the application would be required. Of course, then we are back at the start when app developers mark all their permissions to be core.