state = init_state()
while state is not complete:
state = LLM("You are a helpful assistant. The rules and format of the game is [...]. The correct strategy to use at each step is [...]. The current state is [...]. Output the state after making the next move")
This is a joke. The games that the “trick” AI “wins” are complete losses. The paper authors are claiming losses as wins by changing the rules in their favour to win on a technicality after the game, and not configuring the Go AI to even know about their rule.
"CBRE’s study found that a 500-employee firm renting a 75,000 square-foot space in Toronto would face estimated one-year operating costs of $30,224,259. Only Vancouver and Montreal were cheaper. The Bay Area, meanwhile, was the most expensive market for tech companies to operate, with a total estimated cost of $59,124,612.
It’s no wonder, then, that tech titans such as Google, Amazon, and Uber continue to expand their operations in the city."
The difference in rent is about the cost of hosting a single intern for a summer... Hardly a big factor.
I agree with you for the most part, but there definitely is a toxic extreme of "hustle culture", in which people believe the sheer amount of "hard work" is the only coefficient.
They've recently added javascript that mimics system UI asking you if you want to open the content in the app or in the browser. I'm also almost certain that the loading bars on mobile web are artificial sleeps.
The devs have made the rendering algorithm secret. So even if you have the cat token, you can't know what it looks like unless you go through their front-end.
That's a distorted view that you get from imagining if you had invested at the low of the last recession. Look at Japan's index, where it still hasn't caught up to the 1989 peak.
The cars could be subject to vandalism, or at the very least really aggressive driving. The predictability of the driving and the lack of a driver is going to result in weird interactions with people.