I think the visual elements do make a difference but taking that out...it has probably not much differences with bootstrap...I'll be working to make it more semantic, lightweight...and that should give a better development experience...
First of all I woukd like to say that your framework is one of the ones I like the most when developing mine...
I know it's a big file but it is because it has a lot of comments, I have to work on the sass version to change the comments style...the minified version is close to 133 kb or so...but I definitely have to reduce it and make it lighter...
You got that right....it uses the same format for naming the classes but it have some other features bootstrap does not..
I just think to choose a framework you have to see if the class names make sense...how easy is to adapt and change...to fill your needs...just my humble opinion...
I'll continue working to give a better api and built more useful addons
Hey thanks a lot for the feedback!!...it's really great!...I totally agree with on the row-fluid class name I'll updated that. I want to make a more semantic class names to give more meaning to the markup....
I'll consider the font on the navbar...probably just reduce the font weight would do the trick....
Thanks again for the feedback. I'll be working on it! :)
It is just another option for a framework...it included some cool features that flatstrap does not probably the checkbox and radios buttons are the best example...
Also it was a challenge I put on myself and built better css