klue·vor 14 Jahren·discuss@FooBarWidget, an obvious Phusion Passenger troll (look at his posts)> "Javascript is so much easier to program for than C"G-WAN offers both. And 13 other languages.> if you have 2 million users then switching to G-WAN does not give you a lot of added advantageNode.js will never survive 2 million users if it faints at 1 thousand users.> "Why is G-WAN faster?"For the same reason that makes Nginx faster than Apache: better coding.> "What's the difference between Node and G-WAN's Javascript engine?"None. You criticize without reading. It is said that "G-WAN runs node.js as a script engine (which results in testing V8)".> "Where is the source code for the benchmark?"On the site that you claim that you have read.> "G-WAN is a very interesting product but it would have so much more potential if the author behaves more professionally."Hmmm... you probably mean, like you?You "moderated" this Hackers News entry to: - spread FUD about G-WAN and - promote Phusion Passenger (your product) Phusion Passenger is not censored on Wikipedia because, like Node.js, it is much slower than G-WAN.Maybe that's why you ask how G-WAN manages to be so much faster?
klue·vor 14 Jahren·discuss> "who would buy a web server they couldn't test first?"G-WAN is a freeware that can be downloaded from its web site.How "neutral" in a debate is such kind of false claims that G-WAN can't be tested?
> "Javascript is so much easier to program for than C"
G-WAN offers both. And 13 other languages.
> if you have 2 million users then switching to G-WAN does not give you a lot of added advantage
Node.js will never survive 2 million users if it faints at 1 thousand users.
> "Why is G-WAN faster?"
For the same reason that makes Nginx faster than Apache: better coding.
> "What's the difference between Node and G-WAN's Javascript engine?"
None. You criticize without reading. It is said that "G-WAN runs node.js as a script engine (which results in testing V8)".
> "Where is the source code for the benchmark?"
On the site that you claim that you have read.
> "G-WAN is a very interesting product but it would have so much more potential if the author behaves more professionally."
Hmmm... you probably mean, like you?
You "moderated" this Hackers News entry to:
Phusion Passenger is not censored on Wikipedia because, like Node.js, it is much slower than G-WAN.
Maybe that's why you ask how G-WAN manages to be so much faster?