Would be interested in the math you did around this. That said, there are a few interesting things that could be added on to the service to make it more profitable--so it's not necessarily just the economics of parking.
MITMproxy is much more flexible--but steeper learning curve. Very command line-y versus Charlesproxy. I'd use charlesproxy for casually look at apps, and MITM if you needed more advanced stuff.
Not sure if this is why Square required you to sign, but rates for covering fraud are affected by whether you have customers sign or not for credit cards.
That said, I don't think the cognitive dissonance is because of some crazy fantasy however. The creator of bitcoin clearly went to some great lengths to avoid people knowing his actual identity. Given this, it seems very odd for them to have used their real name in all communication.
Good system I've seen for domain buying is this: You set price you'll pay. Broker decides to take job. They negotiate a price that equal to or lower than your cap. They get fixed fee plus X% of difference between price paid and max price you'd be willing to pay.
This sounds interesting! Excuse my lack of knowledge in case this is a silly question, but from my understanding most of the profit in being a chef comes from high margin alcohol and beverage sales. Would this make more sense for the aspiring chef than using a platform like Kitchensurfing or something else?
Why would converting deliquefication terminals make sense? By the time we convert them, wouldn't you expect technology transfer of fracking to have spread internationally (AND be much cheaper), making exporting less economically feasible?
This is pretty common, and there's certainly a wave of open source software based companies currently. Definitely a tricky thing to navigate, of course.
Typically I find it works best when the company is very clear about which areas they feel should be open source and which areas they will be monetizing. Its the ambiguity and loss of trust that creates tension.