Disclosure: I was a student in the first round of this course and prior to enrolling, only vaguely knew of Cody as 'that guy who hacked hotel locks'.
For anyone considering this course, it's well worth the price of admission. Especially if your company pays :) Cody challenges each student to think like a breaker. The course is very hands on. I'd plan to spend at least 5 hours a week on the coursework.
As a result of what I've learned, I've found numerous bugs within internal apps at my company, bugs within random email survey links, bugs within vendor code. Bugs, bugs everywhere!
My only nitpick with the course was that there were some unforeseen scheduling issues that affected the pace and caused it to extend out to > 12 weeks in length. But I attribute most of those to being part of the first/beta run. I have confidence that Cody will get everything worked out in future iterations.
It doesn't take long to see that Cody really does have a genuine interest in teaching others about security. His willingness to share his knowledge is a benefit to anyone willing to learn.
As a satisfied user of the latest CyanogenMod nightlies on a 2 year old Galaxy S2, this is great news! CM has breathed new life into my outdated hardware.
However, I have to echo the concerns in the post's comments about Gapps[1] (Gmail, Maps, Play Store). I wouldn't say the dependency is as strong as something like Zynga/Facebook, but if Google ever chose to lock Gapps down, I don't know that I'd stick with CM.
This is unfortunate but hopefully their experience helps them as they get back into the working world.
In the past 3 months, I signed up and canceled an account. The issue I have with internet points is that whatever the algorithm is that powers the score is ultimately arbitrary. A few days ago I noticed my score dropped by ~10 points and I couldn't figure out why so I canceled. Similar situations have happened on StackOverflow in the past.
This used to upset me until I realized that there's no counter stocked full of silly putty and plastic frogs where I could redeem my points. In hiring instances, I definitely see value in SO and Github because they can expose you to how someone communicates (in both English and code). But I imagine it's a hard sell to market an aggregated score from unaccredited sources.
I'll admit it, I'm skeptical. I'm also a bit jealous that I can't seem to find 10 spare minutes a day for learning.
Some quick internet sleuthing led me to https://angel.co/grapefeed which appears to show that she's the co-founder of a social-sharing website that just happens to be written in Rails.
If that's the case, then she likely has access to the other co-founder/Rails developer. Not to take anything away from her work, but it doesn't seem quite the same to me as the "One day I woke up and decided to learn web development on my own" tone that I took away from the blog post.
I understand discrimination is real and I wasn't implying otherwise. But I also worked in the past for a monster competitor and I can say that at least at the company I worked for "new" candidates were promoted much more than existing candidates.
Hiring managers would much rather see an email titled "20 new candidates for your XYZ position!" than "20 people who haven't updated their profile in 2 years for your XYZ position".
Creating two profiles at the same time would eliminate this issue, although employers might then wonder why 2 candidates have the exact same profiles...
Isn't it likely that Monster has some sort of "freshness" indicator that might rank new profiles higher than old ones that haven't been updated in a while?
A better experiment would have been to create two similar profiles at the same time with the only difference being the name and diversity questionnaire.
To me, part of the issue is that there are two audiences (event planners/event related services vs. someone who needs help planning an event) and the homepage attempts to market to both at the same time. The subheading and the call to action seem to contradict each other. "Jellifi is looking for event planners" vs. "Plan Event Free"...huh?
That said, I do think it's an interesting concept and suggested it to a friend who does event photo booths and he seemed very interested in signing up.
I've found that the small companies I've worked for ignore the HR related policy issues for as long as possible with a mostly negative impact on employee morale.
Owners/management say things like "we're small so we don't have a set vacation policy." Which sounds cool and works out fine until Willy starts coming in at 11 am and leaving at 3 pm and you wonder why you're stuck at the office on a holiday.
IMO It's much better to have set policies so everyone knows where they stand. Another option is to find a company that doesn't hire/tolerate those types of Willys, but that's difficult to know beforehand.
Playing http://theverge.com with my Android phone - the final path just before the end of the level reads "Why Andy Rubin and Android called it quits".
http://www.overthewire.org/wargames/natas/