Yes I expressed myself badly. I meant risk mitigation plan. Usually in grant proposals we are asked to identify what are the major risks (in terms of incidence x impact) for each work package and produce a mitigation plan in case it happens.
This looks interesting, and like it could fill a gap for the planning of research grants. Any chance it could integrate task-level risk management plan, and export as a Gantt chart?
More like CICO, but make sure to eat high satiety carbs, a variety of vegetables, a lot of protein, enough good fats, and have a way to estimate your overall activity level and keep it constant or even slightly higher than usual (e.g. a step counter) to account for NEAT decrease.
The core issue of CICO as you pointed out is that it's a truism that ignores key aspects of a diet that usually come with a restriction in caloric intake - hunger can lead to poor food choices (decrease in TEF) and leads to lethargy (decrease in NEAT) which can account for up to 500 kcal/day (don't quote me on this, just trying to remember the papers I had read a long time ago) and completely negate the dieting effort. That's not even accounting the approximations of CI.
Anything that states that an entire macronutrient is more satiating than another macronutrient is crank science and you should dismiss it. High fibre "carbs" for example are incredibly satiating.
A few things that come to mind from having worked in many coffees in a few countries where those were implemented would be to institute an off-peak/peak time policy where people are asked not to work during peak time (e.g. lunch), have some sort of subscription model which comes with a faster wifi and X drinks a month.
It looks very nice. Only thing I am worried about is how you plan to make it sustainable. I don't fancy spending time filling a profile for everything to disappear in a few months.
That's fantastic. I was about to start a project in October building something that's almost completely there already, for a specific use case (annotation of therapy sessions).
"Astrology for nerds" is one way of describing it that I always liked even though I don't know who is the original author of the expression (if there even is one).
It reminds me of the old Eureqa software [1], which I used almost 10 years ago in some research work. It got bought out by a company and kind of shut down, so it's nice to see alternatives. Since then some good packages like gplearn have emerged [2], what are you offering that it cannot do?
As a side note if I were you I would be a lot more selective about what you put in your blog, because your post on the inadequacy of neural networks is a bit embarrassing, and paints a pretty bad picture of your own tool.
If treating their workers with decency is such an insurmountable hurdle then yes I would argue that we are much better off without your friend's company.
That's all great in theory, but in practice you are always forced one way or another. If you are not forced to take paternal leave, then social pressure forces you to not take it.
This looks nice, and I might give it a try to transcribe the live Q&A sessions I am doing for the course I teach. My question is how well does it handle accents? My slight French accent often trips the Cortana-powered transcription that is integrated in PowerPoint, but I assume your models are a bit more complex than those.
I have a couple of Google Home Minis but I never paid for them, one was gifted by Spotify and one by Google when they were getting rid of their stock of the old model. I usually use them to control the lights and Spotify/Netflix when I am too lazy to get off the couch in the middle of an episode. They are also getting less and less useful because the voice recognition is getting steadily worse (false negative and false positive recognition of wake-up sentence has easily doubled since I got them). I could easily live without them but I still think the technology is cool. When they stop working I will probably look for a full-blown local alternative that doesn't rely on the Internet.