It would have been interesting to see if you tried this while logged in on a Google account not belonging to a security researcher.
It's a remote change but maybe it brings up totally random results that are then passed though your accounts search bubble filter. Hence sec related topics.
I agree, well expanded. The mechanism seems to be a lot safer in a liquid thorium reactor where the thorium drains away into a safety chamber in the event of a similar disaster.
I just wanted to point out the events the article portrays are incorrect and the writer could have conveyed this message without insinuating there was a meltdown due to the failure of the (wait he says fuel rods not control rods....) O well.
As far as I was aware the reactors at Fukushima shut down correctly as soon as the earth quake occurred. While the crisis definitely continued I think the reporters portrayal of the reasoning is somewhat misleading. As it insinuates it was the fuel rods inability to control the reaction was the problem, rather than the cooling system's inability to deal with the excess heat generated post shut down.
"When a uranium reactor overheats and the fuel rods can’t contain the chain reaction, as happened at Fukushima, the crisis continues."
It's a remote change but maybe it brings up totally random results that are then passed though your accounts search bubble filter. Hence sec related topics.