No matter how many times 'tis deleted or hidden, syntax error does not equate to inadequate robustness. Syntax errors have nothing to do with unexpected variations in experience, and everything to do with coding errors.
I see that you can copy and paste; 'tis still not pertinent to a syntax error, which will break this site on browsers like Chrome and IE (and Safari and Firefox), with 1 visitor or 1000 (or 0 or 74635494635).
How does a syntax error have anything to do with robustness? Now if you had mentioned something that made sense, like "testing" or "continuous integration", then only the "'tis" would be irritating.
Can I ask for an argument in support of Laravel being the only PHP framework on here? I think it's very "cool" (especially the Silex-esque routing), but there's not a whole lot of Laravel jobs out there.
How about a pane for "How to build a static HTML/CSS website" that hides all panes but prerequisites? Then maybe one on how to build a dynamic site (raw, no framework). Then to build an [x-framework] site. Then, the penultimate pane, "How to build a scalable web application with automated infrastructure (prereq: chef or puppet or whatev), advanced monitoring (prereq: Nagios, or whatever that CustomInk/Etsy toolset is called), test-driven development (prereq: Lang-appropriate testing libs), and continuous integration (prereq: Jenkins)"