The real objectives of such sites and authors is not to actually educate or provide facts, data, verifiable data, but to convey a message, in a subtle but sarcastic way, most people will not bother to actually click and verify the hyperlinks, but will just read the initial paragraph.
The message conveyed is in the headlines and in first paragraph.
" so sacred that lower castes (more than 75% of modern Hindus) weren’t even allowed to listen to it being recited."
He provides NO data, facts, to support this claim, but wants the readers to actually believe this.
Let us debunk the this article, point by point, step by step.
1 - >Sanskrit is the liturgical language of Hinduism, so sacred that lower castes (more than 75% of modern Hindus) weren’t even allowed to listen to it being recited.
Dog barking, no source or authenticity of the claim.
2 - > The earliest form of Sanskrit is that used in the Rig Veda
Again, no source for this claim ?
3 - > a dynasty called the Mitanni ruled over the upper Euphrates-Tigris basin, ...............
The message conveyed is in the headlines and in first paragraph.
" so sacred that lower castes (more than 75% of modern Hindus) weren’t even allowed to listen to it being recited."
He provides NO data, facts, to support this claim, but wants the readers to actually believe this.