Yeah, that's his biggest problem. I was with him as he presented evidence, but then he just dives into all kinds of conclusions and wanders straight into conspiracy theory territory and loses credibility fast. I do think the gas pipeline theory as some real merit and, it appears, to have some strong circumstantial evidence to support it, but to draw conclusions from the data? Sorry, but you just can't. There isn't enough, and to try linking it multiple mental health issues? That's not how that's done.