I think you've hit it... the idea + the person. They have to think YOU are competent. Most Geeks/coders appreciate competency above most other traits...
The change-the-world thing... is 50/50, in my experience. Some coders really want to change things for the better, others look no further than the screen...
The last thing I'll say is that it seems that lately... a lot of coders have gotten really judgmental about the DESIGN of the products they work on. So if you commit to having a talented designer contracted it might get you brownie points. Nothing kills the buzz like having to skin one's app with the client's sister's scribblings
please pardon my bluntness
I'd be much more diplomatic (and less honest) if you were my client ;-)
Hey, Good stuff!! sounds a lot like "release early, release often"
RE: approaching us folks...
Your list of "whats important" didn't include equity. In this market, I think you need to be looking for a "techie" partner, more than an employee that likes your "dress code".
And on a personal note, I think of a "techie" as the guy who sets up the printers and unboxes the new LCD monitors... we are "geeks" or "coders" - IMHO
not only is puzzle/quiz/aptitude testing the future of job applications... I'd throw in _conditioning_ (like the Suk doctors in Dune or the current military). Talent will be rewarded much more when money isn't wasted on less efficient, competent, dedicated and honorable people.
The change-the-world thing... is 50/50, in my experience. Some coders really want to change things for the better, others look no further than the screen...
The last thing I'll say is that it seems that lately... a lot of coders have gotten really judgmental about the DESIGN of the products they work on. So if you commit to having a talented designer contracted it might get you brownie points. Nothing kills the buzz like having to skin one's app with the client's sister's scribblings
please pardon my bluntness
I'd be much more diplomatic (and less honest) if you were my client ;-)