This is a long, dense essay with dated language posted with no context. It is cumbersome to read. Does anyone have a more accessible article which parallels the ideas here?
Can someone explain the setup of the 0=1 exercise? It's poorly worded. Is it saying find: (Y,1,+,1,×) or is it saying find what "1" has to be to make it a valid field?
We tried phantomjs for a while but it was very unstable (regularly crashed and since it's open source, bug reports often go ignored, even with stack traces), undocumented behavior, and fairly unusual ecosystem. I believe phantom made a fundamental mistake of not being nodejs based in the first place. Phantom has some really nice features though, like being able to read the console output. Selenium is kind of a joke in terms of features, but at least it's stable. I would choose selenium unless you get a specific benefit out of phantomjs.
I am horrified by this essay. It's overwhelming how much disturbing information is in here. I am deeply saddened that someone so young has had their beliefs so strongly influenced.
Some of the most disturbing passages:
> it would seriously impair our ability to spy if we couldn't gather everything.
It is saddening to hear someone so young say this.
> I am an American patriot. Patriotism to me simply means that I care about the US and its future.
How often is the word "patriot" used internally in the NSA? Who is building up this false hero, blind to his own oppression? A synonym might be a "justifier" or "oppressor" or even more simply "someone who has not yet been oppressed."
The rest speak for themselves:
> The NSA copy of my emails will only be viewed if the Agency can convince a judge that I might be a foreign agent.
> The vast majority of unauthorized retrievals of US-person data are unintentional.
> ...the rare cases of unauthorized data retrieval were ... regular employees illicitly viewing communications for personal gain
> XKeyscore ... was an analyst tool that I had access to.
> NSA employees are the law-abiding type.
I am scared to respond to this article. How easily could I be labeled a "foreign agent"? Does criticizing the system mean I'm working for another country? Did the NSA try to demonize Snowden as working for the Russians? Everything you have written has only increased my fears. To hear the blind loyalty to the system that comes from the NSA's own employees means that nothing is safe.
I hope that later in your life, as you grow as a person and a citizen, you see the evil in the system you colluded with, and experience a deep regret about your actions. The same regret that lay citizens feel when we learn our tax dollars have built a criminal entity. The regret that we did not try harder to stop it, to read up on laws like the Patriot Act and protest more. The regret of our collective ignorance that has built the tool to intrude on everything we do.
The actual answer is that insider networks are used to upvote stories. If you don't have a network of people you know on HN to upvote your article, it is very unlikely to ever get seen or noticed. This is a wart of HN that people don't want to talk about. Traffic isn't organic; it's a popularity contest at best. It would be naive to think that people wouldn't game a system that can drive so much traffic to any site.