There was a zero chance the company with the best AI LLM models would not get involved in weaponization, willingly or not.
DAI is going to be one of the first things the next administration brings back, mark my words. Saying it's discriminatory is like saying affirmative action is discriminatory
Tampermonkey scripts with chatgpt is even faster. Adding a functionality to a website just by pasting the site's html in chatgpt and in 2min I get what I need.
I don't think this can be prevented with a schema. The only thing someone has to do is legally rename themselves to "Driving license" to be the edge case in this check. Teach cops to look for the (almost) international driver license format where your names are preceeded by the numbers 1 and 2 on the license.
Not yet, but I imagine soon they will. Closed source is moving to video and open source is catching up to static images with incredible pace. I won't be suprised if not only GIMP integrates something like a couple of general stable diffusion models but pirated copies of photoshop find a way to hook up a local generative model instead of the online stuff.
As is the case with this exact company
"
Fight Corporations
Beat Bureaucracy
Find Hidden Money
"
this is exactly and entirely the thing a exploiting company would say it does.
Can someone explain exactly what is the "unknown" of neural networks? We built them, we know what they comprise of and how they work. Yes, we can't map out every single connection between nodes in this "multilayer perceptron" but don't we know how these connections are formed?
yea but we're not in tribes, are we? People take this evolutionary bullshit way too seriously, like we still run around with sticks and stones. None of that crap matters when we live in a modern society. Teenages are going to "socialize with themselves" whether they sleep in or not, no matter what, because, guess what, that's what people do in modern times. They can choose.
Yes but saying "screw the government" on social media today, doesn't really matter if it's going to be applauded in the future, it's still going to be aimed at the government, which is the whole point of the system.
Each symbol of the 11 characters in the plus code is in base 20. There are about 2500 emojis, meaning that you can encode 2 symbols from the plus code with one emoji (20*20=400, if you try to encode 3 symbols, it becomes 8000, which is way more than the current emoji count). So that would become 5 emojis, instead of 11 characters, which in my opinion would look quite nicer.