This is aimed more at companies signing up rather than individuals, but a company called Security Innovation has a product that kind of gamify's (sp?) hacking vulnerable websites: https://www.securityinnovation.com/training/ (the cmd+ctrl training)
They have a couple of fake websites that have a bunch of vulnerabilities of varying difficulty and you get points for exploiting them.
I am not affiliated with them, but saw a demo once and thought it was cool.
As noted by another commenter, they employ 500k people and execute on thousand of projects per year. Most of those projects are likely success stories to some degree.
I have this exact same question. I've found some conventions over the years that have been helpful, but haven't found anything comprehensive.
With regards to what the arrows indicate, I've done dotted line arrows are synchronous, with a solid arrowhead meaning request body and an outlined arrowhead being the response. Then used solid black line with a single solid arrowhead for an asynchronous request.
I don't see where you get that he's threatening the expert witness. He obviously thinks that the expert witness knowingly presented "evidence" that they should know is bogus and is intended to sway the layman jurors who don't know any better. He thinks there should be consequences for such behavior.
Without gloves you could only punch someone in the forehead so many times before your hand starts to hurt/gets injured. With gloves you can go all day.
I don't entirely understand. He has to live in it for 7 years to claim ownership and Bank of America has already issued an eviction notice, how is he still allowed to live there?