>Snowden was never taken into custody in Hong Kong.
Why would he?
>Anyway, everyone already knows what they need to know: if you're acting against the "interests" of the Five Eyes countries (primarily the US or the UK), don't trust any computers in or from those countries, unless you can reliably examine everything.
Well, that really goes for any country who has the capabilities, I would say.
>Because if they are "heavily" spying on the U.S., they already knew all what Snowden had, and more.
We don't know this, and how would the Chinese know specifically what Snowden has? Do you have anything to suggest that they did?
>How many gov employees + contractors have top security clearances in the US? That's how.
This doesn't say much. Just because you have a clearance doesn't mean you have access to classified documents. In the miltary, for example, almost all aircraft maintainers have a secret clearance and they just fix tires.
I actually asked a question concerning Chinese intelligence gathering on US entities which by extension relates to Snowden. Why would the Chinese spy so heavily in the US, but pass up US secrets that's practically on their doorstep?
For anyone who pays attention to this kind of stuff, you would know China has an aggressive spy campaign against the US primarily for its technology. So I earnestly ask how in the world would China pass up the opportunity to get hold of the documents Snowden held? He was in their territory with the highest US secrets, and they just let him go? For just nothing in return? Just like that? Snowden said they never got anything (other than what has already been leaked), but there's no way I can honestly believe that when China has so much to gain.
Why you never document your code? You didn't document your Clojure libs and now you're continuing the trend with Haskell. If you're going to make libs, please provide the adequate documentation with examples of usage in the code. I'm not gonna keep going back to the README. I'm going to use Hoogle and Hackage. All those comments in the README could be looking all pretty on Hackage right now.
Why would he?
>Anyway, everyone already knows what they need to know: if you're acting against the "interests" of the Five Eyes countries (primarily the US or the UK), don't trust any computers in or from those countries, unless you can reliably examine everything.
Well, that really goes for any country who has the capabilities, I would say.