Goodbye Android(motherboard.vice.com)
motherboard.vice.com
Goodbye Android
http://motherboard.vice.com/read/goodbye-android
6 comments
This is possibly one of the best reasons to use something like Cyanogenmod, giving you control over updates rather than waiting on manufacturers and mobile operators.
I'm currently using Cyanogenmod (on a Samsung Note 3) but have a problems where I really consider to switch back to the stock ROM:
- Battery life is reduced quite much, I spent quite some time finding the root cause with BatterBatteryStat, but in the end, it are just the core services which seem to use more power, there is no app in the background. With Cyanogenmod it discharges in the night for ca. 30% without doing anything and disable WLAN. When I still had the stock ROM I was out in the mountains for 5 days and could take almost 400 photos without recharging. SlimROM was much better in this regard, but they didn't had the PrivacyGuard and so far do not support the Note 3 on their newer ROMs.
- I tried to avoid Google Play, unfortunately a few apps depend on it (especially all the ones using Google Map). But my main problem is more that I've no idea how dangerous alternatives like Aptoide are. I accidentally downloaded some apps which were already fully unlocked, while only available for money on Google Play. I found a Java Program (http://www.onyxbits.de/raccoon) to download apps through a Google Account on your PC and then transfer it onto your phone, but this is somewhat cumbersome.
- Battery life is reduced quite much, I spent quite some time finding the root cause with BatterBatteryStat, but in the end, it are just the core services which seem to use more power, there is no app in the background. With Cyanogenmod it discharges in the night for ca. 30% without doing anything and disable WLAN. When I still had the stock ROM I was out in the mountains for 5 days and could take almost 400 photos without recharging. SlimROM was much better in this regard, but they didn't had the PrivacyGuard and so far do not support the Note 3 on their newer ROMs.
- I tried to avoid Google Play, unfortunately a few apps depend on it (especially all the ones using Google Map). But my main problem is more that I've no idea how dangerous alternatives like Aptoide are. I accidentally downloaded some apps which were already fully unlocked, while only available for money on Google Play. I found a Java Program (http://www.onyxbits.de/raccoon) to download apps through a Google Account on your PC and then transfer it onto your phone, but this is somewhat cumbersome.
Use TextSecure (https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=org.thoughtcri...) by Open Whisper Systems (https://whispersystems.org/)
Supposedly the vulnerability is in stagefright, which is the Android framework responsible for audio/video encoding/decoding and playback. TextSecure doesn't do any pre-processing of received audio/video messages, so it seems unlikely that a vulnerability in stagefright could be triggered simply by sending audio/video to a TextSecure user.
TextSecure plays audio/video by handing it to the system's default media player. If there's a stagefright vulnerability, it's possible that the system's default media player is vulnerable. From TextSecure, that interaction should only happen by physically tapping on an audio/video attachment, then tapping through a warning dialog about insecure playback. At that point, it's out of our hands.
- moxie
https://lists.riseup.net/www/arc/whispersystems/2015-07/msg0...
Supposedly the vulnerability is in stagefright, which is the Android framework responsible for audio/video encoding/decoding and playback. TextSecure doesn't do any pre-processing of received audio/video messages, so it seems unlikely that a vulnerability in stagefright could be triggered simply by sending audio/video to a TextSecure user.
TextSecure plays audio/video by handing it to the system's default media player. If there's a stagefright vulnerability, it's possible that the system's default media player is vulnerable. From TextSecure, that interaction should only happen by physically tapping on an audio/video attachment, then tapping through a warning dialog about insecure playback. At that point, it's out of our hands.
- moxie
https://lists.riseup.net/www/arc/whispersystems/2015-07/msg0...
Will this fare better than when it was submitted 3 days ago?
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9968214
That one was flagged and sank without trace.
http://hnrankings.info/9968214/
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9968214
That one was flagged and sank without trace.
http://hnrankings.info/9968214/
I was quite surprised my submission wasn't already in HN. Hopefully the link will spark an interesting discussion.
Nope. And it's been flagged again. I don't know why people think a discussion about this doesn't belong here, but there you go.
It's a shame people are associating the name StageFright with the vulnerabilities instead of the media framework itself because it's possibly the best named library I've ever seen ;-)
I'm on a Samsung device, which means updates are pushed several months after Google pushes theirs. I'd love to go to CM, but then the camera quality is just downright awful because of a lack of TW drivers... Quite annoying
A state who can finance themselves around those barriers to entry may have similar exploits against iOS, but we're less likely to find out about them.