New camera promises to capture your whole life(newscientist.com)
newscientist.com
New camera promises to capture your whole life
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn17992-new-camera-promises-to-capture-your-whole-life.html
17 comments
> Thing thing I've come to realize is that it must be an integrated system that is automatically indexed and searchable, tagged by date, time, location as well as having speech recognition and face detection in order to be truly as useful as it should be.
Absolutely. But do we need those systems to exist before we start life-logging? As long as the data is available, we can always go back and then index. As it is, it looks like the recording capability will be there long before the software is polished to perfection. If people wait until the software is perfect, then every day they wait is a day they'll never be able to put into the database.
> I also think there should be a 30 second rolling frame buffer so that you can hit 'record' and capture five minutes of full-motion video starting 30 second earlier so that you can fully capture important conversations and the like.
Short-term optimization. The real goal is just default full-motion video; collect everything. The long-term storage space is essentially here already: you can right now buy 1.5TB for ~100$ (see http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16822152... ). The problem is on the collection end - I mean, a fish-eye camera with 1gb for $800? How much is a 16gb flash drive these days, 30$?
Instead of hacking around the limits, let's just do the right thing: a small video camera hooked up to a couple dozen gigabytes of Flash.
How much? Well, I've heard that a minute of H.264 480 x 272 is about 3.5mb, let's call it 4mb. Recording sleep is useless, so 4 * 60 * 16 = 3840; 3.8 gigs per day means that even a basic flash drive would suffice for multiple days of video, and that we fill up our 100$ 1500mb hard-drive in ~394 days, or more than a year.
(I keep wondering: is it really that difficult to have a small video camera, that all these researchers keep using still cameras? Why don't we have easy life-logging now? As you say, all of the tech exists.)
Absolutely. But do we need those systems to exist before we start life-logging? As long as the data is available, we can always go back and then index. As it is, it looks like the recording capability will be there long before the software is polished to perfection. If people wait until the software is perfect, then every day they wait is a day they'll never be able to put into the database.
> I also think there should be a 30 second rolling frame buffer so that you can hit 'record' and capture five minutes of full-motion video starting 30 second earlier so that you can fully capture important conversations and the like.
Short-term optimization. The real goal is just default full-motion video; collect everything. The long-term storage space is essentially here already: you can right now buy 1.5TB for ~100$ (see http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16822152... ). The problem is on the collection end - I mean, a fish-eye camera with 1gb for $800? How much is a 16gb flash drive these days, 30$?
Instead of hacking around the limits, let's just do the right thing: a small video camera hooked up to a couple dozen gigabytes of Flash.
How much? Well, I've heard that a minute of H.264 480 x 272 is about 3.5mb, let's call it 4mb. Recording sleep is useless, so 4 * 60 * 16 = 3840; 3.8 gigs per day means that even a basic flash drive would suffice for multiple days of video, and that we fill up our 100$ 1500mb hard-drive in ~394 days, or more than a year.
(I keep wondering: is it really that difficult to have a small video camera, that all these researchers keep using still cameras? Why don't we have easy life-logging now? As you say, all of the tech exists.)
Why don't we have easy life-logging now? I don't get why you'd want to do this. Sorry I just don't get it. Why would you want to record your whole life, especially on a pendant-cam that would be bouncy and pointing at something irrelevant half the time.
If a lot of people would want something like this, I must really be getting old and out of touch.
I guess it might appeal to the types of people who keep diaries or journals now. I'm not one of them, and neither is anyone I know. Do you keep an audio record of your whole life now? That's been feasible for a long time. Why not? What about video would make you start?
If a lot of people would want something like this, I must really be getting old and out of touch.
I guess it might appeal to the types of people who keep diaries or journals now. I'm not one of them, and neither is anyone I know. Do you keep an audio record of your whole life now? That's been feasible for a long time. Why not? What about video would make you start?
> Why would you want to record your whole life, especially on a pendant-cam that would be bouncy and pointing at something irrelevant half the time.
Family videos are bouncy and pointing at something irrelevant half the time as well.
> Do you keep an audio record of your whole life now? That's been feasible for a long time. Why not? What about video would make you start?
Omni-directional mikes would pick up too much; directional would be inconvenient to aim. Video is vastly easier to navigate, since we think spatially and visually - how do you scroll through an audio recording? With video, you get feedback as to where you are temporally, especially if there's movement from place to place; with audio, you just randomly fastforward hoping to get nearer where you want to hear, if you can even recognize progress towards or away from the clip you want. (An example: I have a video of a boardwalk, versus audio, and I want to look at an encounter. Will it be easier for me to find that encounter if I can look at the video, or if I just have to listen to random ambience & chit-chat?)
Further, video picks up written material, it will pick up gestures and body language of speakers, and, incidentally (and importantly for the hard-of-hearing, like me) makes spoken language much clearer because you can do some lip-reading.
And remember the practical uses thought of for lifelogging; how would an audio recording help you in traffic court? Some background noise, a screech, a honk, and a thud is worthless. An audio recording might pick up your child's first word - but not also his first step, like a video would.
Family videos are bouncy and pointing at something irrelevant half the time as well.
> Do you keep an audio record of your whole life now? That's been feasible for a long time. Why not? What about video would make you start?
Omni-directional mikes would pick up too much; directional would be inconvenient to aim. Video is vastly easier to navigate, since we think spatially and visually - how do you scroll through an audio recording? With video, you get feedback as to where you are temporally, especially if there's movement from place to place; with audio, you just randomly fastforward hoping to get nearer where you want to hear, if you can even recognize progress towards or away from the clip you want. (An example: I have a video of a boardwalk, versus audio, and I want to look at an encounter. Will it be easier for me to find that encounter if I can look at the video, or if I just have to listen to random ambience & chit-chat?)
Further, video picks up written material, it will pick up gestures and body language of speakers, and, incidentally (and importantly for the hard-of-hearing, like me) makes spoken language much clearer because you can do some lip-reading.
And remember the practical uses thought of for lifelogging; how would an audio recording help you in traffic court? Some background noise, a screech, a honk, and a thud is worthless. An audio recording might pick up your child's first word - but not also his first step, like a video would.
Good news! For several years now, Gordon Bell at Microsoft has been working on exactly what you describe. AFAIK, it isn't available publicly yet, but there are articles on it. Google for "Gordon Bell" and "lifelogging."
Who was the guy at MIT who had camera, wearable computer, projection glasses etc. with him at all times? I've read long time ago (more than few years) via Slashdot about how he got in trouble with security often, but I can't remember who it was.
Anyway, if you read the article it is the same tech licensed from MSFT.
Anyway, if you read the article it is the same tech licensed from MSFT.
Steve Mann
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steve_Mann
http://wearcam.org
Interesting factoid: he was the one who invented the word "sousveillance".
Interesting factoid: he was the one who invented the word "sousveillance".
That's more like it. Thanks!
Kevin Warwick?
http://www.kevinwarwick.com/
http://www.kevinwarwick.com/
We all just know that this will be technically feasible in our lifetime. The challenges, as you pointed out: if it's not searchable, then we'd have to spend a second life browsing through our first. Then there are some privacy issues, which will probably be ignored in practice, if past history is any guide.
But it has some very interesting consequences on human interaction.
But it has some very interesting consequences on human interaction.
if it's not searchable, then we'd have to spend a second life browsing through our first.
Just having the "faces" technology from iPhoto '09 would go a long way towards organizing this record. Have a WiFi enabled device that uses Bonjour to auto-upload when you are at home, and iPhoto can go and index the visual record based on who.
There can also be an "auto-event" splitting based on dramatic changes in lighting. GPS could also be used. An interval where a person is moving across the city would constitute one event, and the interval where they are at one location would constitute another. GPS could also auto-assign names to events, like "Minneapolis Convention Center, October 16, 2009 2:30pm."
Just having the "faces" technology from iPhoto '09 would go a long way towards organizing this record. Have a WiFi enabled device that uses Bonjour to auto-upload when you are at home, and iPhoto can go and index the visual record based on who.
There can also be an "auto-event" splitting based on dramatic changes in lighting. GPS could also be used. An interval where a person is moving across the city would constitute one event, and the interval where they are at one location would constitute another. GPS could also auto-assign names to events, like "Minneapolis Convention Center, October 16, 2009 2:30pm."
I like sousveillance and exocortex enhancement in general; and the attempt at capturing intelligently in specific. But this seems a little underambitious for the price--just 1GB of memory? No automatic, regular backups by wifi or EDGE?
Wireless would be a great addition. Just automatic WiFi detection and upload/deletion would make using it seamless for most people. Disable the audio, if there is any, and I'd just wear it all the time.
I would love something like that. I'm tired of people doing shitty things to me and ones I love, then getting away with it with barefaced lies. It doesn't happen often, but it does happen. My girlfriend was just rear-ended by another driver. She even got their license plate, but the police decided it wasn't worth following up, possibly because she was confused by the make of the car. She just doesn't understand that stuff.
I've been physically threatened, had local bureaucrats fictionalize tests, been in accidents where the other driver was doing some preposterous passing on the right-side by speeding over parking spaces, had police who kept interrupting me before I could finish sentences but then claimed I was being rude -- all these are situation where people just lie after the fact and get away with stuff. I'm the one who tells the truth, and yet I am the one that gets shafted. I am tired of that!
I would love something like that. I'm tired of people doing shitty things to me and ones I love, then getting away with it with barefaced lies. It doesn't happen often, but it does happen. My girlfriend was just rear-ended by another driver. She even got their license plate, but the police decided it wasn't worth following up, possibly because she was confused by the make of the car. She just doesn't understand that stuff.
I've been physically threatened, had local bureaucrats fictionalize tests, been in accidents where the other driver was doing some preposterous passing on the right-side by speeding over parking spaces, had police who kept interrupting me before I could finish sentences but then claimed I was being rude -- all these are situation where people just lie after the fact and get away with stuff. I'm the one who tells the truth, and yet I am the one that gets shafted. I am tired of that!
[deleted]
Whole life? If I had one it would involve quite a lot of things that this camera wouldn't capture.
"Final Cut" with Robin Williams depicts a future where all life moments are recorded.
I guess Big Bro is coming soon as electronic jewelry
Thing thing I've come to realize is that it must be an integrated system that is automatically indexed and searchable, tagged by date, time, location as well as having speech recognition and face detection in order to be truly as useful as it should be.
I think the ideal device would also have a 'bookmark' button that indexes sections you want to be able to find later on - very handy for remembering names, faces, etc.
I also think there should be a 30 second rolling frame buffer so that you can hit 'record' and capture five minutes of full-motion video starting 30 second earlier so that you can fully capture important conversations and the like.
All of the tech exists, it's just not been integrated in an intelligent way as of yet which is a real shame.