Unshackled – Funding for immigrant founders with US work visas(unshackled.co)
unshackled.co
Unshackled – Funding for immigrant founders with US work visas
http://www.unshackled.co
7 comments
just adding on, most folks who do not have this background of an immigrant do not understand the approx 10 year penalty you have to pay before you can start your own company here in the US. starting in 20s is different from in 30s. but hey, we play the cards we are dealt and slope matters more than intercept :).
This is an excellent hack if it holds up on the legal fronts! There might be constraints, which I have not seen called out yet, such as - a H1B visa holder having to be employed in their field of specialization, hence the H1B founder will need to startup in said field. But the constraints appear trivial in comparison to the problem being solved. This is exciting!
Not only that!. Companies that sponsor an H1B person need to "show" proof that they have attempted to hire a US person before they can turn to sponsor an in immigrant.
I'm worried about the ownership of the startups. as they are developed by employees of Unshackled so to speak.
And what if a startup doesn't take off?
And what if a startup doesn't take off?
[deleted]
OT: The moving image behind text that visitors are trying to read is the worst design trend since carousels (aka sliders).
Perhaps you haven't seen parallax websites.
I've seen two variants of parallax - parallax scrolling (which is fine) and parallax videos that play behind text. When you're trying to read text, having a moving image behind the text makes it harder to read. It looks cool, but it's a bad design. And not just for the readability issues, but also due to the loading. For example, PayPal has it on their front page now. I used to be able to go to PayPal and immediately click the login button. Now I have to wait for the loading to finish. It's annoying.
I find parallax scrolling to be ineffective. Call me old school but it takes a well understood action (scrolling) and overloads it to perform animations. Animations which often times do not add much value besides "flair". An ineffective tradeoff in my opinion.
And yes, videos behind text is absurd :).
And yes, videos behind text is absurd :).
Saw this on Techcrunch.
Are you solely funding only immigrants and or a team with one or more immigrants?
Do you consider a team of US citizens?
Are you solely funding only immigrants and or a team with one or more immigrants?
Do you consider a team of US citizens?
Based on the contrast between their FAQ & the title, it looks like they are technically allowing "anyone with authorization in the US", and in practice discriminating like crazy. Otherwise, what exactly is the point of this?
Ironically, it'd probably be legal if structured as an actual VC / angel firm plus coworking, but "If selected, join Unshackled as employees" makes it subject to employment law.
The dual employee / investment model seems loaded with conflicts of interest on both ends. The only way it makes sense is if you need to be an employee for immigration purposes.
Ironically, it'd probably be legal if structured as an actual VC / angel firm plus coworking, but "If selected, join Unshackled as employees" makes it subject to employment law.
The dual employee / investment model seems loaded with conflicts of interest on both ends. The only way it makes sense is if you need to be an employee for immigration purposes.
>>Do you consider a team of US citizens?
According to their FAQ, they do.
But it is supposed to be a company that is helping immigrants who want to start companies but can't due to legal reasons. That is massive pool of very hard working people, who are moving mountains else where for pennies. If you can direct the same monumental effort towards something more constructive, that would be a lot more profitable. Hence tapping into that talent pool.
But if you had an idea to build the next Google, Twitter or Facebook, I guess they would be more than willing to listen.
But then if you truly had such an idea, and are a US citizen why would you need them?
According to their FAQ, they do.
But it is supposed to be a company that is helping immigrants who want to start companies but can't due to legal reasons. That is massive pool of very hard working people, who are moving mountains else where for pennies. If you can direct the same monumental effort towards something more constructive, that would be a lot more profitable. Hence tapping into that talent pool.
But if you had an idea to build the next Google, Twitter or Facebook, I guess they would be more than willing to listen.
But then if you truly had such an idea, and are a US citizen why would you need them?
From the FAQ - item 3 (emphasis added):
"All applicants should be authorized to work in the USA. This includes citizens of the USA"
"All applicants should be authorized to work in the USA. This includes citizens of the USA"
Q: Since H1-B employers needs to run payroll, will they run it for the entire team and count it differently from the investment?
Often you will spend pointless time just doing this circus. So much so you would be rather better off, directly working hard on the main exam.
Start ups are hard, you will likely fail certainly. In all that work there is to do. And all that stress, anxiety and tension you are likely to go on merely working on your start up. I wonder what is the point in taking all the pain to fight for a Visa amidst all this(Which you are very likely not to get).
There is no doubt there are amazing benefits of working in the USA. I would do anything to get an opportunity to work in the United States. But to get a H1-B(Or any work related visa) is a great challenge, especially for guys like me. Plus years of living under perennial threat of getting fired, losing your job, having to restart your green card process all over again(If you've started), and redoing all of this if you lose your job all over again, spending decades doing this and chasing sub goals. At some point you have to wonder, if its all worth it.
Why not spare yourself the pain. And work on the actual thing itself.