Raise the Gas Tax(slate.com)
slate.com
Raise the Gas Tax
http://www.slate.com/articles/business/moneybox/2013/12/blumenauer_gasoline_tax_hike_oregon_congressman_wants_higher_fuel_taxes.html
3 comments
> The reason is, that in many cases, the fuel taxes collected are far, far in excess of the money actually spent in maintaining the road and building new roads.
Actually, you have this backwards[1]. The cost of maintaining roads exceeds the revenues generated by gas taxes.
In fact, the only transportation 'use tax' account that consistently runs a surplus is the federal Airport Improvement Trust Fund.
[1] First hit on the Google: http://www.governing.com/topics/transportation-infrastructur...
Actually, you have this backwards[1]. The cost of maintaining roads exceeds the revenues generated by gas taxes.
In fact, the only transportation 'use tax' account that consistently runs a surplus is the federal Airport Improvement Trust Fund.
[1] First hit on the Google: http://www.governing.com/topics/transportation-infrastructur...
Are there other sources that discuss the cost of roads and bridges? One of the main arguments people use against high-speed rail in the US, for instance, is that it's not profitable, except in the North East between Washington and Boston.
I'd love to see a gas tax that is progressive based on population density within 10-20 miles of the gas station. They greater the population density, the higher the tax. Rural gas stations pay the least tax per gallon and city gas stations pay extremely high tax per gallon.
This really is a bad idea. This subsidies sprawl and fuel consuming lifestyles. Gas taxes pay for a part of the externalities of fuel burning which rural folks do a lot more than urban dwellers.
I wish I could figure a way to make the following suggestion not so painful on the working poor, but if the social cost of burning a gallon of gas is $2.10, why not hike the gas tax to something north of that AND index it for inflation automatically?
I realize that I have a certain privilege to live 15 minutes from work, and that those who drive long distances to work would be hurt by such a policy, if you take today as a frame of reference. But, perhaps they should be hurt by it, if indeed they're costing society that excess amount.
Phasing it in linearly over an 8 year period starting 2 years from now would blunt some of the transitional sting, perhaps.
I realize that I have a certain privilege to live 15 minutes from work, and that those who drive long distances to work would be hurt by such a policy, if you take today as a frame of reference. But, perhaps they should be hurt by it, if indeed they're costing society that excess amount.
Phasing it in linearly over an 8 year period starting 2 years from now would blunt some of the transitional sting, perhaps.
Typically for these kinds of articles, nowhere is the actual cost of maintaining the road system actually mentioned.
The reason is, that in many cases, the fuel taxes collected are far, far in excess of the money actually spent in maintaining the road and building new roads.
And most politicians love the slush-fund aspect of all the money that flows in, and the horse-trading that goes into determining how it is spent.
Also not mentioned and not included in the calculations: the thousands of dollars taken in on sales taxes, license fees, plate fees, etc. over the (let us say 15 year) lifetime of your average car.