Amazing CSS3 3D popup book(2012.beercamp.com)
2012.beercamp.com
Amazing CSS3 3D popup book
http://2012.beercamp.com/
49 comments
While the overall graphics and the general mechanism looks decent, the actual action of turning a page if very kludgy and glitchy. I found it difficult to get the pages completely turned since the book kept rotating a bit.
Another tiny nit: They don't need those "+" icon interactions. They could've just used the book rotation controls as-is. Popup books usually don't have buttons, at least not from my generation /getoffmylawn.
What browser/OS are you using? For me in Chrome/OSX, the pages turn flawlessly.
Chromium-based RockMelt 0.16.91.something (on Win7)
So I'll get down voted for this but it needs to be said: this is very cool and is a great proof of concept for the direction things are going. However, if you're promoting a commercial product, event, etc., you could have just used flash--it would be trivialish to implement, perform better, and have no cross browser issues--although no iOS to be fair...
As it stands, how many people will hit the site, see it's not working because they have the wrong browser version, and leave?
As it stands, how many people will hit the site, see it's not working because they have the wrong browser version, and leave?
> and have no cross browser issues--although no iOS to be fair...
I love this casual dismissal of tablet/mobile phone users as if it were a non-issue.
I love this casual dismissal of tablet/mobile phone users as if it were a non-issue.
Hardly a non-issue, but again, judging by comments below, hardly an issue that's been solved here.
So flash or JS, certain mobile users that should be able to see it won't be able to see it.
So flash or JS, certain mobile users that should be able to see it won't be able to see it.
> So flash or JS, certain mobile users that should be able to see it won't be able to see it.
JS can be fixed for those users, though. Flash can't.
JS can be fixed for those users, though. Flash can't.
Umm... as if that animation even worked on iOS or Android browsers...
One thing to consider is that their target audience is attendees of the Front-trends conference, a conference specifically for front end developers. I think it's a safe bet that a majority of the traffic will have a compatible browser.
Ha, excellent point. Judging by some of the comments here, much of their traffic may not have a compatible browser version after all, but I'd imagine that they still have a higher tolerance for that sort of thing in the name of advancing the field.
This is a terrible attitude. Among the other things that have been pointed out, not all desktop browsers have Flash. For example, no computer I own has Flash installed on the system. If I need Flash for some reason, I keep Chrome around, but it has to be a damn good reason to bother with.
Yes. Because graceful degradation isn't a thing.
Obviously they didn't apply it here fully, but it would have been possible for them to reuse their text divs on text-only browsers, drop their svgs for some prerendered raster graphics on SVG-less browsers, use their SVGs but have them render flat on 3d-transform-less browsers, have static 3d copies of each page if JS isn't available but 3d was, etc., etc.
It's even possible for established sites to collect statistics on combinations of available browser features, estimate ROI vs. development effort and decide which combinations beyond the least-common-denominator are worth coding for and slowly roll them out one at a time.
Obviously they didn't apply it here fully, but it would have been possible for them to reuse their text divs on text-only browsers, drop their svgs for some prerendered raster graphics on SVG-less browsers, use their SVGs but have them render flat on 3d-transform-less browsers, have static 3d copies of each page if JS isn't available but 3d was, etc., etc.
It's even possible for established sites to collect statistics on combinations of available browser features, estimate ROI vs. development effort and decide which combinations beyond the least-common-denominator are worth coding for and slowly roll them out one at a time.
That's not the point of the site. It's an annual meetup where people push the limits of the latest and greatest web technologies. The people visiting it will be web designers/developers, not Jane Doe who only visits facebook.
They could have done it in Flash but then they would not have been featured on HN's frontpage.
There seems to be quite a lot of Javascript in there as well :) Really nice design.
BTW: works fine in Safari 6.0 OSX
BTW: works fine in Safari 6.0 OSX
This is, to use a word I never use, delightful! Great concept, whimsical design, and wonderful execution. Well done!
Now, if I could only stop flipping the pages and get back to work...
Now, if I could only stop flipping the pages and get back to work...
works "meh" in firefox 14.01. You can browser, but it stutters and you don't see the nice pop-up effect. It just appears when the page is turned far enough.
Seems like they should have some sort of fallback to users of IE can at least get some information about the conference
Very neat effect though. Is this based on actual folding math or is it just a series of neat animations? Like could this be built into a sort of popup book framework?
Very neat effect though. Is this based on actual folding math or is it just a series of neat animations? Like could this be built into a sort of popup book framework?
You only need a fallback for IE if your audience uses IE
"Boo! It looks like your browser doesn't support 3D transforms."
Latest Chrome on Centos6 using a ssh socks proxy.
edit: solved thanks to http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4393135
Latest Chrome on Centos6 using a ssh socks proxy.
edit: solved thanks to http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4393135
Really cool design, I love seeing seamless in browser 3D, can't wait till this is the norm.
Works smoothly on Safari 6.0 (8536.25) in Mountain Lion 10.8.
Hey you polish frontend hackers! Nice work!
Immediately crashes iPad Safari :-(
Works fine on my iPad 2, iOS 5.1.1.
doesn't work under Chrome Version 20.0.1132.57 :(
I find it interesting that this works, or doesn't. Based on these "Micro-Version" differences as well as whole version differences. What are the key differences? Is it actually chrome or some other system level difference?
Chrome Version 21.0.1180.79 works for me.
Chrome Version 21.0.1180.79 works for me.
3D transforms is nearly completely dependent on the GPU of your machine. about:gpu in Chrome will give you more information about the differences and capabilities of your machine. In some cases, old drivers are too unstable to support and so they're blacklisted by Chrome.
[deleted]
Gah this helped me a lot, thanks. about:gpu told me my WebGL was disabled in about:flags... which it was. Not sure how that happened as that's been annoying me forever.
Follow these instructions:
http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4393135
http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4393135
Version 21.0.1180.79, doesn't work for me either.
Working great in : Chrome 21.0.1180.79 m
Okay in 21.0.1180.75 (OS X).
hmmm, mine works fine:
Chrome Version 20.0.1132.57m
win7
works in Chrome 21.0.1180.79 beta-m
Followup on how it was built here: http://coding.smashingmagazine.com/2012/04/17/beercamp-an-ex...
Full repo here: https://github.com/nclud/2012.beercamp.com