I think this highlights inherent flaws in the governing body approach to web development standards.
I mean, if all the major browsers have it implemented already, why not remove the prefix? In fact, why have the prefix at all? If a feature X is unavailable on browser Y but implemented on browser Z, I can't see how the prefix Z makes any difference to browser Y.
I mean, if all the major browsers have it implemented already, why not remove the prefix? In fact, why have the prefix at all? If a feature X is unavailable on browser Y but implemented on browser Z, I can't see how the prefix Z makes any difference to browser Y.