Prove email and phone are required in online services
2 comments
What would you use instead of an email address to identify a user upon registration? An email address is something most people have and its a workflow people are familiar with.
I think the point is NOT to identify users, but only to not have spam/bots. Unless it’s a paid service, users should not have to identify themselves. You can keep out bots with CAPTCHA.
Users should not have to identify themselves regardless of the service being paid or free. Because stopping spam and bots is possible without requiring the user to provide an email or a phone number.
Nobody cares about anything.
Nobody cares about anything.
How do you purpose Netflix, Salseforce, etc. charge their clients if they don’t even know who their clients are?
Please don’t say crypto.
Please don’t say crypto.
>Why is no other option offered to the user?
Name these other options, please.
Name these other options, please.
One is the same option you used to signup for HackerNews: a new username. Not a pre-existing email or a pre-existing phone number.
I thought that an e-mail was asked also on HN, maybe it is optional?
If this can't be proven mathematically and you are an online service then please answer: why must online services require users to provide an email address or a phone number to get service? Why is no other option offered to the user?
Why is it impossible for a human to use online services while not having an email or a phone?