Ask HN: Does GPT-4 signal the start of the singularity?
6 comments
I've never heard of this definition of the singularity. Wikipedia (for whatever that's worth) defines it as follows:
"The technological singularity—or simply the singularity[1]—is a hypothetical future point in time at which technological growth becomes uncontrollable and irreversible, resulting in unforeseeable changes to human civilization."
Humans could still be in the loop but the AI enables changes that exceed our ability to predict or contain them.
"The technological singularity—or simply the singularity[1]—is a hypothetical future point in time at which technological growth becomes uncontrollable and irreversible, resulting in unforeseeable changes to human civilization."
Humans could still be in the loop but the AI enables changes that exceed our ability to predict or contain them.
I agree with the Wikipedia definition, but I assume once technology has the ability to develop without humans, it will develop without humans.There won't be much elapsed time between these two events.
Here's an article that seems to indicate yes:
https://www.quantamagazine.org/the-unpredictable-abilities-e...
https://www.quantamagazine.org/the-unpredictable-abilities-e...
I don’t know but I’m in disguise as a paperclip just in case.
Has there been any indication that it's better at designing models than its designers?
What's the singularity?
The invention of LLMs is surely closer to that hypothetical point in time than the invention of steam machines or iron swords, but even nowadays technology is still very dependent on a working human society to continue functioning.