JavaScriptMVC 3.2 is out(javascriptmvc.com)
javascriptmvc.com
JavaScriptMVC 3.2 is out
http://javascriptmvc.com/
3 comments
Are there lots of people who like JavaScriptMVC? I used it but soon moved to Backbone.js. And now I'm considering moving to Spine.js, which looks more advanced. (Or, at least more "rails-like" with its Model API.)
> Are there lots of people who like JavaScriptMVC?
count me one of them. i am really a fan of it. it gives my apps structure, it has fixtures build in, and when i want to go to production it compiles my app down to one css file, one js file and one html file. and all that in a nice package, with no need for me to get all this stuff done by hand (thinking about some directory structure for my app, setting up fixtures, downloading google closure compiler, setting all up, ...).
count me one of them. i am really a fan of it. it gives my apps structure, it has fixtures build in, and when i want to go to production it compiles my app down to one css file, one js file and one html file. and all that in a nice package, with no need for me to get all this stuff done by hand (thinking about some directory structure for my app, setting up fixtures, downloading google closure compiler, setting all up, ...).
Why did you change to backbone.js?
I posted it because I used it for a few apps and I really like it.
Changelog:
https://github.com/jupiterjs/javascriptmvc/blob/c53ddc4edcbd...
Changelog:
https://github.com/jupiterjs/javascriptmvc/blob/c53ddc4edcbd...
This is great, but after switching to CoffeeScript, I just can't imagine working directly with JS ever again. It's be awesome if you'd somehow integrate CS development into your system.
Jmvc supports coffee script.