Why Handwriting Must Die(miller-mccune.com)
miller-mccune.com
Why Handwriting Must Die
http://www.miller-mccune.com/culture-society/handwriting-is-history-6540/
4 comments
This is blogspam. Link to the source: http://www.miller-mccune.com/culture-society/handwriting-is-...
Blogspam and flamebait. I generally have to chuckle whenever anyone calls for the "death" of whatever (e.g. handwriting, shaking hands, installed operating systems, programming languages). If said item is so supposedly offensive or heinous, but managed to help us be productive in some fashion for a reasonable amount of time, declaring it needs to go reeks of insecurity.
If writing words by hand is too slow for your mind, you're not thinking hard enough. The speed of touch-typing approaches the speed of cognition, but deep analytical and creative thought is much slower than even the slowest forms of committing information to a medium (eg. engraving a stone tablet).
The "speed of cognition" I'd imagine is mainly limited by the fact that most people say (in their mind) what they read/write as they go along and we can only speak so fast. With writing we are also limited by our fingers but reading can go much faster if one learns to get rid of the inner voice (speed reading).
And even though I agree with you that touch-typing isn't that much of a limiting factor when compared to the time required to come up with something sensible but unfortunately, at least for me, those deep analytical and creative thoughts doesn't produce a steady stream of characters but rather bursts of sentences and paragraphs and taking the time to writing them out obstructs the thought process (depending on what I'm doing (most of what I do isn't that challenging)). So I'd say that the speed improvements of touch-typing compared to handwriting can be quite useful (and being able to get rid of it entirely by taking 'snapshots' of a current thought process, continue, and then later go back and summarize and formulate all snapshots would be awesome).
And even though I agree with you that touch-typing isn't that much of a limiting factor when compared to the time required to come up with something sensible but unfortunately, at least for me, those deep analytical and creative thoughts doesn't produce a steady stream of characters but rather bursts of sentences and paragraphs and taking the time to writing them out obstructs the thought process (depending on what I'm doing (most of what I do isn't that challenging)). So I'd say that the speed improvements of touch-typing compared to handwriting can be quite useful (and being able to get rid of it entirely by taking 'snapshots' of a current thought process, continue, and then later go back and summarize and formulate all snapshots would be awesome).
And some forms that are effortless to write by hand are very thought intensive to write on a keyboard. I am mostly thinking about mathematics.
I disagree with this statement: “Most of us know, but often forget, that handwriting is not natural. We are not born to do it." Handwriting evolved out of pictograms, which evolved from doing artwork. So writing is very natural because it's really a form of drawing if you think about it.
handwriting cannot be beaten when your cell has no battery and you need to pick-up the number of that foxy lady, bonus (or not) you will look like a vintage hipster...