Are Keyboards on Laptops the Next Thing to Go?(technologyreview.com)
technologyreview.com
Are Keyboards on Laptops the Next Thing to Go?
http://www.technologyreview.com/blog/mimssbits/27084/?p1=blogs
15 comments
They'll have to rip my IBM model M out my cold dead fingers!
I have a tablet. So often I try to type on it & use a terminal, and it is terrible. I get used to the size and key configuration but what I have problem with is hitting my fingers in the glass surface repeatedly. Doing it for a minute or two is ok. Doing for an hour is painful.
Also noticed on a tablet I become more of a passive consumer of a information -- I read mostly. On the desktop I am more inclined to produce -- I write code, type comments, write email.
I have a tablet. So often I try to type on it & use a terminal, and it is terrible. I get used to the size and key configuration but what I have problem with is hitting my fingers in the glass surface repeatedly. Doing it for a minute or two is ok. Doing for an hour is painful.
Also noticed on a tablet I become more of a passive consumer of a information -- I read mostly. On the desktop I am more inclined to produce -- I write code, type comments, write email.
> Also noticed on a tablet I become more of a passive consumer of information
As I mention in my upcoming book on blogging, my workflow works exactly like that and I definitely recommend it. I mostly produce on my MacBook Pro, while I use the iPad to consume information and stay up to date at night, thanks to apps like Reeder and Flipboard. This way I keep work and "play" (well, less crucial work) separate.
As I mention in my upcoming book on blogging, my workflow works exactly like that and I definitely recommend it. I mostly produce on my MacBook Pro, while I use the iPad to consume information and stay up to date at night, thanks to apps like Reeder and Flipboard. This way I keep work and "play" (well, less crucial work) separate.
The thing is - blogging isn't work for me, it's play...
Sure. In that sense, it lets you separate "producing" and "consuming".
Interesting. I also find that when I read Wikipedia, for example, on my laptop, and I see a typo or something, I'm almost always inclined to fix it. On anything with a touch screen, however, it's just far too much bother. Could the rise odd theipad see the decline on the participatory Web 2.0 and the rise of the consumerist Web 3.0?
I've been looking at HiWave (formerly NXT) in Cambridge (UK) to let me use their HIHX14C exciters for tablet touch panels, in order to let give my users the effect of depressing mechanical keys when touching the panel surface. I hope to combine this with the fact that these exciters can be used essentially as drivers to conduct sound through the panel, so I can turn the whole tablet into a speaker. You can see the parts here: http://bit.ly/nc16KY
Not that I expect my target audience (people fighting attention deficit in dementia or in childhood) to type for hours every day, but I wonder if this might be a way to improve the experience and accuracy of typing on the whole: haptic/sonic feedback...
Not that I expect my target audience (people fighting attention deficit in dementia or in childhood) to type for hours every day, but I wonder if this might be a way to improve the experience and accuracy of typing on the whole: haptic/sonic feedback...
I find keys by touch. If I'm pressing ctrl-F4 (for instance) I'm find the F4 by the slightly larger gap between it and F5.
Removing this possibility would make typing a _lot_ harder.
Removing this possibility would make typing a _lot_ harder.
To find that gap, your fingers would have to move across, feeling a difference between a key and a gap between keys, until they feel a larger gap.
Feeling different vibrations when your fingers at those places would impart the same information. e.g. if _ is vibration, and a space is no vibration, the function keys would feel like this:
Feeling different vibrations when your fingers at those places would impart the same information. e.g. if _ is vibration, and a space is no vibration, the function keys would feel like this:
___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___If they can react extremely quickly, and to a light touch, then maybe it will work.
I'm happy to give it a go, but it really is going to have to be very impressive to allow touch typists to function.
I'm happy to give it a go, but it really is going to have to be very impressive to allow touch typists to function.
Agreed it would be impressive. And quite strange, if a vibration on the whole surface had the same effect as an actual physical change ona specific part of the surface, just because that's where your finger was when it vibrated.
(Reminds me of arthur dent, zapped to the RatEotU, encountering pain where-ever he touched his body, and eventually realizing it was his finger that hurt).
I wonder, if it responding fast enough, you could brush your finger across it, and it would feel like there was a pattern on the surface (by it vibrating/not depending on where your finger was)... Sort of a zero-dimensional display. Of course, wouldn't work for multi-touch (though the haptic patent does seem to manage this, by creating a waveform whose peak is sharply localized).
(Reminds me of arthur dent, zapped to the RatEotU, encountering pain where-ever he touched his body, and eventually realizing it was his finger that hurt).
I wonder, if it responding fast enough, you could brush your finger across it, and it would feel like there was a pattern on the surface (by it vibrating/not depending on where your finger was)... Sort of a zero-dimensional display. Of course, wouldn't work for multi-touch (though the haptic patent does seem to manage this, by creating a waveform whose peak is sharply localized).
Maybe if they can produce a truly realistic mechanical feedback system. The 'haptic touchscreens' I've seen have generally been 'we buzz this little offset-counterweight pager motor when you hit something'
Doing it right would probably require some sort of truly flexible (and incredibly resillient) display, with some sort of adaptive force-feedback (matrix of tiny pistons with pressure control, or something)
The patently apple article linked gives a bit more detail about the image presented, but it still looks very low resolution (although there looks to be some novelty in suppressing feedback from surrounding haptic elements)
Doing it right would probably require some sort of truly flexible (and incredibly resillient) display, with some sort of adaptive force-feedback (matrix of tiny pistons with pressure control, or something)
The patently apple article linked gives a bit more detail about the image presented, but it still looks very low resolution (although there looks to be some novelty in suppressing feedback from surrounding haptic elements)
There's a lot more to the feedback one gets from a good keyboard than just "tiny vibrations". Haptic virtual keyboards may well end up replacing hackers' / writers' primitive push button ones one day, but they must get pretty damn good before they do.
That being said, I'm quite certain this is the future. At least for mainstream users.
That being said, I'm quite certain this is the future. At least for mainstream users.
If a manufacturer can produce a virtual keyboard that I can type blind on at 100wpm, without slowly drifting off target, and correct typos that I've felt rather than seen, then we might be getting somewhere. Until then, no way.
Which might, I suspect, be up there with affordable tabletop cold fusion.
Which might, I suspect, be up there with affordable tabletop cold fusion.
It's amazing that these people are working so hard to recreate the experience of "typing" on a ZX81 keyboard.
Most laptop (and desktop) keyboards are pretty horrible already. So I'm sure that the final step to these awful abominations is not far away. Depressing.
Most laptop (and desktop) keyboards are pretty horrible already. So I'm sure that the final step to these awful abominations is not far away. Depressing.
Not unless laptop manufacturers wanted to create the next gorilla arm. Using an input device without mechanical feedback will not work for serious data entry, our hands aren't designed for it. It would cause a huge increase in RSI.
Isn't that a little like saying touchpads will never take off because they're not good enough for precision movement? If you're doing "serious data entry" you'd get an external keyboard.
everyone knows how much better it is to type on tablets, right? right.. yeah well that's why the keyboard isn't going anywhere.
I wonder how this will fit to people who type on a keyboard 10-12 hours a day.
The advantage with virtual keyboard is the infinite reconfiguration capabilities w.r.t. repositioning of keys for reasons of ergonomics.
For the same reasons, though, keyboards designed with ergonomics in mind (e.g. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ergonomic_keyboard) can't be replicated because of size and three-dimensional profile.
The advantage with virtual keyboard is the infinite reconfiguration capabilities w.r.t. repositioning of keys for reasons of ergonomics.
For the same reasons, though, keyboards designed with ergonomics in mind (e.g. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ergonomic_keyboard) can't be replicated because of size and three-dimensional profile.
I believe keyboards are on the way out regardless of whether haptic technology ever develops to the point where it can replace a real keyboard. Few people do serious data entry. On-screen keyboard is good enough for overwhelming majority of users. I think physical keyboard will become a peripheral device used in some professional settings, but not by an average user.
It very well could be, but I very much doubt that the keyboard will be replaced in the near future. 10 years? Maybe. But not for the near future. People are too ingrained to let keyboards go any time soon.
I don't think. Actually, I think it's tablets that will be receiving keyboards, a la Asus Transformer style. You get the best of both worlds.
No one's mentioned. Keys also serve as a shock absorber. I speculate that years of tapping/rapping/pounding on a glass or hard plastic surface might produce significant joint problems.
P.S. I'm referring not just, or primarily, to the force applied, but the the suddenness of the transition to full pressure (cushioned only by one's soft tissue).
P.S. I'm referring not just, or primarily, to the force applied, but the the suddenness of the transition to full pressure (cushioned only by one's soft tissue).
Oh dear god please NO!
There are human computer interfaces for different computer sizes. The mouse and keyboard are good for "human scale" devices like the desktop and laptop. Touch is great for pocket sized devices, and motion is good for even larger devices. The mouse and keyboard aren't going away, it's just that we'll have more non-"human scale" devices.