The Effects of an External Focus of Attention on Running Economy(journals.humankinetics.com)
journals.humankinetics.com
The Effects of an External Focus of Attention on Running Economy
https://journals.humankinetics.com/view/journals/jmld/aop/article-10.1123-jmld.2020-0067/article-10.1123-jmld.2020-0067.xml
6 comments
> Our findings revealed when participants adopted a dissociative-external focus of attention, they consumed less oxygen, had lower blood lactate, and a lower rating of perceived exertion compared with trials completed using an associative attention strategy. The findings of this study demonstrate that running economy is improved and feelings of fatigue are lowest when using a combination of a dissociative-external focus of attention.
I’m not sure how certain can we be on where participants actually focused their attention, as it’s hard (impossible?) to measure. Separately from that, I believe the exact location of associative-internal focus matters.
For example, the experimenters used this method to trigger associative-internal focus:
> the examiner repeated the phrase “Focus on the muscles in your feet” during the running action.
I suspect that:
— It’s possible to hear this phrase without actually directing the focus anywhere.
— Engaging verbal mechanism could actually be counter-productive, if it triggers inner monologue and keeps part of the attention in one’s head so to speak.
— Focusing on the muscles in the feet might not be conducive to good running form. Could that focus lead to tensing up of those muscles? I generally attempt to engage the core and keep the extremities relaxed. That said, I don’t have the relevant expertise and am willing to be corrected.
Anecdotally, I noticed that external focus of attention sometimes makes physical effort easier in the moment but does not necessarily help maintain good form (unless it’s already well-developed enough to be maintained automatically, which isn’t a given considering participant selection method), while what seems to be referred to as “associative-internal focus of attention” IMO takes some time and effort but, used appropriately, helps maintain good form and aligns with economy over long time periods.
I’m not sure how certain can we be on where participants actually focused their attention, as it’s hard (impossible?) to measure. Separately from that, I believe the exact location of associative-internal focus matters.
For example, the experimenters used this method to trigger associative-internal focus:
> the examiner repeated the phrase “Focus on the muscles in your feet” during the running action.
I suspect that:
— It’s possible to hear this phrase without actually directing the focus anywhere.
— Engaging verbal mechanism could actually be counter-productive, if it triggers inner monologue and keeps part of the attention in one’s head so to speak.
— Focusing on the muscles in the feet might not be conducive to good running form. Could that focus lead to tensing up of those muscles? I generally attempt to engage the core and keep the extremities relaxed. That said, I don’t have the relevant expertise and am willing to be corrected.
Anecdotally, I noticed that external focus of attention sometimes makes physical effort easier in the moment but does not necessarily help maintain good form (unless it’s already well-developed enough to be maintained automatically, which isn’t a given considering participant selection method), while what seems to be referred to as “associative-internal focus of attention” IMO takes some time and effort but, used appropriately, helps maintain good form and aligns with economy over long time periods.
So you run farther when you focus on the trees rather than on how your body feels.
Might be why the “fartlek” workout has been a fixture in running plans for decades. In Swedish it means speedplay and the original structure of the workout was there is no structure. Start running, spot a landmark like a pole, run hard to it, jog until you see another one like a tree, run hard to it, and repeat. This research might suggest this type of activity let’s athletes run harder than they normally would.
Nowadays many coaches prescribe timed intervals to structure the fatlek, so the original idea behind it has kinda been lost though. In fact, timed workouts actually have the opposite effect where athletes perform worse at the same rate of perceived effort than distance based workouts.
Nowadays many coaches prescribe timed intervals to structure the fatlek, so the original idea behind it has kinda been lost though. In fact, timed workouts actually have the opposite effect where athletes perform worse at the same rate of perceived effort than distance based workouts.
If by "focus on the trees" you mean "ingest a legal THC product" then this does agree with my experience.
I find that when I remember, and remember to keep on focusing on a visual metaphor I have for running form and economy the perceived effort doesn't change but suddenly you're going 1 or 2 minutes per mile faster. It's absolutely magic.
> The findings of this study demonstrate that running economy is improved and feelings of fatigue are lowest when using a combination of a dissociative-external focus of attention.
So, optimal training would be chasing your Ketamine dealer?
So, optimal training would be chasing your Ketamine dealer?
To be honest I was thinking this would be about economics
The focusing of the public's attention with respect to the economy, the environment, each other, etc would make for an interesting and maybe even useful study.
I suppose the body is an economy in some sense. It's all about allocation of finite resources.
Does it make it difference? Since mind and body are interconnected, of course it does.
I'm weird but I do sometimes run and imagine I'm actually persistence hunting an antelope, and that some hypothetical tribe would be thrilled to have it. It does supply a boost of energy and makes the run easier. Evolution hacking I suppose.