Twitter Comes Alive With Realtime Activity Streams(techcrunch.com)
techcrunch.com
Twitter Comes Alive With Realtime Activity Streams
http://techcrunch.com/2011/08/10/twitter-activity-streams/
13 comments
I really, really don't like it. It's like bringing a mini News Feed to Twitter, and the layout just doesn't work for me. I'll try to give it a chance, but my early impressions are that it's just a messy, cluttered News Feed implementation.
I agree. I think the problem is Twitter already is a "news feed", it's user provided though. In 99% of cases I don't care if x follows y, whereas on Facebook if x is now friends with y "Hey, I might know Y! Oh, they're someone from high school I haven't spoken to for years!".
It feels unnecessary and irrelevant to Twitter.
It feels unnecessary and irrelevant to Twitter.
I used to think that this content (the new activity feed) being hard to get was an intentional, thoughtful design. It felt nice in contrast with using Facebook, which gives me an unpleasant feeling of everybody observing every single action I make. Turns out Twitter sees it as a missing feature.
It's just one of those things that people say it's not a good idea then get used to it. However, it does provide a great way for spammers to get into your activity stream. It also gets in the way of twitter's casual model of following and un-following when you raise the visibility a notch.
Every time Twitter announces a new feature I grit my teeth, clench my sphincter and rasp, mostly to myself, "What. About. Spam."
It mystifies me that they're content to do so little as this slowly but surely erodes the quality of the Twitter experience. Between scale and spammer volume, I get that it's not an easy problem. But give me something, here.
It mystifies me that they're content to do so little as this slowly but surely erodes the quality of the Twitter experience. Between scale and spammer volume, I get that it's not an easy problem. But give me something, here.
It is a tough problem, I'm pretty aggressive about using the 'block and report as spam' option on TweetDeck, but every so often an account that I've thought was trustworthy will start spewing links that "Make Money Fast".
Why just this afternoon, an iPhone dev who works for a YC funded company...
Why just this afternoon, an iPhone dev who works for a YC funded company...
Ha. Indeed. I don't even know how my account got hijacked. Pretty unsettling.
Given what they did to my browser (I followed the stupid link, in part b/c of who it came from) I'm guessing you hit a booby trapped page while you were logged into twitter.
But that's a theory for which I don't have direct evidence, merely the unreasonable effectiveness of their browser hijacking.
But that's a theory for which I don't have direct evidence, merely the unreasonable effectiveness of their browser hijacking.
Spam probably isn't a HUGE concern for Twitter. I have an account without any "real" followers. They're all spam bots. But it looks good to have 73 followers even if you don't know them - makes people look/feel important.
Kevin Rose touched on this. He called it "social currency".
Kevin Rose touched on this. He called it "social currency".
So that makes the spammers a quantitative easing program for Twitter?
The activity stream just feels pointless for me. Favourites, I don't care, if it's worth me reading then they can retweet it. Retweets, they show up in my stream, if I want to see them specifically I could under the old system thanks to the specific retweets page. Who my friends start following just isn't interesting, and just wastes the space.
And I disagree with TechCrunch's "oh, people hate change, they're not thinking rationally" theory. When newtwitter beta launched last year (I guess 11-12 months ago, can't quite remember) I thought it was cool for about ten minutes, then hated it, and switched back to original twitter, where I stayed until the move was forced last week. In the week I've been using it solidly, I still hate it. And I'm not exactly on my own, EVERY friend I have that uses twitter either moans regularly about newtwitter, or has switched to an external client to avoid using it. Sure, that's a bunch of specific cases not an overall study, but it shows it's not a rare opinion to have.
And I disagree with TechCrunch's "oh, people hate change, they're not thinking rationally" theory. When newtwitter beta launched last year (I guess 11-12 months ago, can't quite remember) I thought it was cool for about ten minutes, then hated it, and switched back to original twitter, where I stayed until the move was forced last week. In the week I've been using it solidly, I still hate it. And I'm not exactly on my own, EVERY friend I have that uses twitter either moans regularly about newtwitter, or has switched to an external client to avoid using it. Sure, that's a bunch of specific cases not an overall study, but it shows it's not a rare opinion to have.
Buh, here I thought they fixed the "2 more tweets, click to reload" to automatically reload.
We don't need more distractions.
We don't need more distractions.
This is going to change how people interact with Twitter, moving from one single place to consume to two, I'm curious how that will work out. I don't think I'd look at it all that often, it just feels like another place they will eventually cover with ads.