Ask YC: What about people who don't know English good enough?
5 comments
Not sure what you mean by A level. Of course you don't need to sound native.
But if you cannot communicate you just cannot communicate. I guess it's pretty obvious. Nobody is going to test your English, but if you will make a bad impression and somebody will be worried that it will be an obstacle, then, well they have every reason to act on that worry.
Just do your thing and don't care about making an error here or there. If you know it's a real issue then go fix it, you will have to anyways.
Just do your thing and don't care about making an error here or there. If you know it's a real issue then go fix it, you will have to anyways.
A level is the most advanced school-level qualification awarded in Britain and by some British examiners to overseas students.
Typically, a student studies towards three A-level subjects for two years as ages 17 & 18; not so long ago AS levels were introduced which count as approximately half an A level, allowing more subjects to be taken in less depth.
British school leavers with thee As at A level are highly accomplished among the world's school leavers, but an A at English A level is not really close to native-like English.
Typically, a student studies towards three A-level subjects for two years as ages 17 & 18; not so long ago AS levels were introduced which count as approximately half an A level, allowing more subjects to be taken in less depth.
British school leavers with thee As at A level are highly accomplished among the world's school leavers, but an A at English A level is not really close to native-like English.
A-level is the first significant level of optional education in Britain and anywhere copying it (such as India and Singapore, though some commonwealth countries call it other things, or have different systems)
I don't man any kind of certification or tests... I just meant knowing English fluently.
Just read this in the Week http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/e3e18a60-9c71-11e0-a0c8-00144feabd... I see the point, the language isn't just the words, the grammar, the combinations of the words, but the intricacies (hidden details) of odd mixes which comes under wit and so on.
I don't think their English would need to be on an A level, but at least enough to communicate their idea across to the panel. It really depends on how much of an issue it is- if they can't even begin to communicate without stuttering, then I don't think it'll work out very well.
I should think it is good if you have someone who can deal with people like VCs in native-like English. I should think it is a serious disadvantage if you have nobody in your core team (i.e., someone who can act as the face of your company) who speaks better than globalese.
Off topic, but you mean 'people who don't know English well enough'. Good luck in your endeavors.
You beat me to it. I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to correct the English of someone who is talking about good English.
Why so offensively? :) English isn't my native...
What specifically was offensive? Is there a way someone could have been more polite?
Should founder(s) know verbal and/or written English on an A level?
Just curious on YC's position...