Crate. Web-based file sharing done incredibly easy.(thenextweb.com)
thenextweb.com
Crate. Web-based file sharing done incredibly easy.
http://thenextweb.com/apps/2011/02/04/crate-web-based-file-sharing-done-incredibly-easy/
37 comments
Sweet. I've been waiting for somebody to make a service that let me upload files to the cloud.
Especially since it's Simple.
Now if only somebody would come out with a service to shorten all these links I have laying around I'll be set.
Especially since it's Simple.
Now if only somebody would come out with a service to shorten all these links I have laying around I'll be set.
haha my thoughts exactly
Oh, and Crate is already profitable. No worries about losing your stuff because the business tanks.
The site seems a little too bare to trust with my credit card, though the free version sounds really great. It seems like it's missing something. Like a weekend project that still has some details to flesh out.
What could we add to change your mind?
A few personal thoughts:
- Allow a custom CNAME for files hosted so that they can be shared on a pro user's own domain (you're already CNAMEing to S3, is it possible for you to add additional CNAMEs onto that for users? I'm not sure.)
- Publicly viewable directory listing for a crate? When I saw the name that's how I assumed it would work straight away, that after creating a crate I can link someone to it and they can see and view all the files in it. Realised this is actually possible before I submitted this comment, but have kept it in here to make the point that it could perhaps be a bit clear. Waiting for a user to mouseover the crate name to discover this feature helps keep the site looking clean, but perhaps isn't the best usability feature (at least for new users).
- No ability to change username (nice but not necessary) or email (necessary) in the settings page
- https://
edit: p.s. I realised that in neither of my comments did I remember to mention - nice work, a really nice minimalistic product!
- Allow a custom CNAME for files hosted so that they can be shared on a pro user's own domain (you're already CNAMEing to S3, is it possible for you to add additional CNAMEs onto that for users? I'm not sure.)
- Publicly viewable directory listing for a crate? When I saw the name that's how I assumed it would work straight away, that after creating a crate I can link someone to it and they can see and view all the files in it. Realised this is actually possible before I submitted this comment, but have kept it in here to make the point that it could perhaps be a bit clear. Waiting for a user to mouseover the crate name to discover this feature helps keep the site looking clean, but perhaps isn't the best usability feature (at least for new users).
- No ability to change username (nice but not necessary) or email (necessary) in the settings page
- https://
edit: p.s. I realised that in neither of my comments did I remember to mention - nice work, a really nice minimalistic product!
Now see? That's the kind of response that I love.
More links in the footer, mainly. A page to contact you either by form, email, or phone number. This goes a long way knowing that I have a way to contact you if I have problems. A Team or Company page would be good to learn a bit more about the personal side of the business and to know that it's not a 1-person shop.
I'd like to be able to change my password. Am I missing something?
http://letscrate.com/settings lets me do that (linked to from http://letscrate.com/home)
[deleted]
It's like a box you can drop stuff in
If only someone had thought of that before, eh?
I was introduced to http://min.us and have been hooked.
Minus is more than photos? Honest question. I knew it was a crazy nice photo sharing app but other file types?
anything. try it. haha
This brought back fond memories of drop.io. There was "ridiculously easy * sharing". Crate does look a nice replacement, Although they offer far less storage and features, it seems like a viable answer to many people's problems. However, the same feature set is covered by Dropbox' Public Folder, or am I missing something?
How is this any different from dropbox or tons of other file hosting sites out there?
I guess it's geared towards some different use case, just compare the workflow with something like Dropbox:
- with Dropbox I've a public folder which is linked from my Finder sidebar so I can simply drop an existing file into it and copy the public URL by right-clicking on it
- with Crate I've to open a tab with the website, navigate to the file, drag back to browser (not Finder, where I am when navigating to the file), then copy the URL, then decide what to do with the original file on my harddisk
Maybe that's easier for some tasks or for some users, I don't know. Maybe the last bit is crucial: do I want to keep the file locally (Dropbox) or just put it out there?
For me, the initial download & setup of something like Dropbox is worth the benefits it provides.
- with Dropbox I've a public folder which is linked from my Finder sidebar so I can simply drop an existing file into it and copy the public URL by right-clicking on it
- with Crate I've to open a tab with the website, navigate to the file, drag back to browser (not Finder, where I am when navigating to the file), then copy the URL, then decide what to do with the original file on my harddisk
Maybe that's easier for some tasks or for some users, I don't know. Maybe the last bit is crucial: do I want to keep the file locally (Dropbox) or just put it out there?
For me, the initial download & setup of something like Dropbox is worth the benefits it provides.
You have to download dropbox.
You don't have to, though it's geared towards that. You can use it entirely through the web interface if you want, manually uploading and downloading files.
And how is drag n drop easier than having an upload button? I don't want to open explorer, find my file there, resize the window and drag with the mouse. Clicking on "upload" button and locating my file is much easier.
scp at the command line is easier still, especially if you define an alias in your .ssh/config file. Do any of the "cloud" file storage services support scp/sftp access?
mftexpress offers support for ftps and sftp as well as web based file transfers over https. http://www.jscape.com/services/mftexpress/
Does anyone know what technique they're using to get the drag and drop uploads working in Webkit?
From the Pastie above, it looks like they are using this:
http://developer.apple.com/library/safari/#documentation/app...
http://developer.apple.com/library/safari/#documentation/app...
http://pastie.org/1527619
Have a look for yourself :)
Have a look for yourself :)
Will take a lot to get me to make the switch from Dropbox. I also use Cloud app (http://getcloudapp.com) and like it.
My sole issue with CloudApp is that linked files are embedded on a page. I freaking hate that.
Same. So frustrating. Maybe I'll try to hack together a similar dropzone for Min.us or Crate.
It's certainly difficult to send a decent screenshot. If Evernote had a feature like the drop-upload of cloud app, they've be money.
I prefer http://ge.tt/. Short URL, simple layout, no sign up needed, lots of bandwidth and storage, no BS.
Remembers me of drop.io (sadly not arround anymore)
[deleted]
Don't you mean: 'incredibly easily'?
Also assuming that all free users use all of their 200mb, and all pro users use all of their 10gb...
They need a free-to-pro conversation rate of 0.37% to break even on the S3 costs, i.e. one pro account for every 271 free accounts.
Alternatively assuming that all users will use 50% of their 200mb or 10gb, then that's a conversation rate of 0.17%, or one pro account for every 593 free accounts.
My guess is that, if we ignore people who try it out and then decide not to use the service, chances are that, of the people who stick around (i.e. the people who will actually store more than one test file), quite a decent number will move to the pro account. So yeah, I can see how they are making a profit, seems like it could turn into a nice (and really easy maintenance) little cash cow.
On a seperate topic, would be amazing if someone created an open source version of this as a front-end for S3 - though I'm far too lazy to do it myself.
edit: I see the creators are reading this thread, so here's a direct query. Any chance you'd create an account for maybe a few dollars a month (less than pro) that you provide no storage for, and that gets hooked up to an S3 (or S3+CloudFront) account of the user's chosing?