No mention in the article of the fact that the Earth's core is SIGNIFICANTLY hotter than the surface. The analysis in the article assumes the Earth's mass begins at 0K and rises from there.
Also, the "greenhouse effect" cited in the article is not described. (For those wondering, Water vapor plays a MUCH more significant role than CO2.)
Also, the "greenhouse effect" cited in the article is not described. (For those wondering, Water vapor plays a MUCH more significant role than CO2.)