Gawker is in the process of emailing its users about the compromise.(kommons.com)
kommons.com
Gawker is in the process of emailing its users about the compromise.
http://kommons.com/questions/395
42 comments
I'm not sure if you guys have dealt with ISP blacklists before, but I think there is a good chance hint.io will never be able to reliably reach an inbox again. Sending emails to white-listed addresses is hard enough to get right, let alone sending to 1.5 million arbitrary email addresses.
It takes a special kind of entrepreneur to knowingly use a list of hacked email addresses to promote their own service.
"Nice Job" hint.io.
It ended up in everyone's spam folders for a reason.
"Nice Job" hint.io.
It ended up in everyone's spam folders for a reason.
Jeff,
Knowing that we've saved tons of people's accounts from being vulnerable while Gawker sat back and did nothing is what I would call a nice job.
Cheers,
Dru
Knowing that we've saved tons of people's accounts from being vulnerable while Gawker sat back and did nothing is what I would call a nice job.
Cheers,
Dru
Mine went to SPAM. Technically, it is.
All 1.5m? I didn't receive anything.
No, not all 1.5MM are publicly available.
EDIT: I did in fact get the email, but gmail is classifying as spam, FYI.
They answered:
"We are in the process of sending out emails to all ~1.5m users affected. Unfortunately, sending out that many emails is not a simple process."
I think MailChimp/Campaign Monitor/SendGrind should be able to handle a 1.5M volume quite nicely.
"We are in the process of sending out emails to all ~1.5m users affected. Unfortunately, sending out that many emails is not a simple process."
I think MailChimp/Campaign Monitor/SendGrind should be able to handle a 1.5M volume quite nicely.
Indeed, sending 1.5m emails is not a problem. not even close to.
It is when you have never emailed the list before and don't have a relationship with a mailing service to do it on your behalf. Not a lot of firms like people walking up with a 1.5m non opted in list that you want to send to immediately.
Their MailChimp API key was hardcoded into their source, so I think they've got an established relationship.
Being Gawker, I'm sure they'll CC every one of their users in the e-mail.
I bet they will get blacklisted on google yahoo and hotmail before they are done. That's a lot of email.
I've often wondered how companies such as the ones listed in another comment (MailChimp, Campaign Monitor, SendGrind) avoid being banned, or any company that sends a large amount of mail. Is something that just requires you to build up reputation over time?
It's a multi stepped process: use different IPs for different clients, warm up the IPs to build good reputation, actively work with ISPs to whitelist the IPs, enroll in loopback programs with the ISPs, carefully monitor spam complaint and bounce rates, etc.
Sending a large amount of email to a well established list can actually help your reputation, since the ISPs see that you send large numbers of emails that don't get reported as span -- that makes the (hopefully) few that do not affect your reputation as much.
Sending a large amount of email to a well established list can actually help your reputation, since the ISPs see that you send large numbers of emails that don't get reported as span -- that makes the (hopefully) few that do not affect your reputation as much.
My email from teamhint was in my Gmail spam folder.
If there weren't a nugget of truth in this, this phrase from the email would actually be hilarious:
"We HIGHLY recommend you change all of your online passwords as a precaution."
Thankfully my Gawker password was limited to a few sites of no worth and you can't deduce any of my other ones form it.
There's a little bit of scaremongering in that sentence though. Why change your other passwords, UNLESS your Gawker password was your email password too? After 19 years on the Internet, I have a lot of logins.
OpenID ain't looking too bad now, is it?
If there weren't a nugget of truth in this, this phrase from the email would actually be hilarious:
"We HIGHLY recommend you change all of your online passwords as a precaution."
Thankfully my Gawker password was limited to a few sites of no worth and you can't deduce any of my other ones form it.
There's a little bit of scaremongering in that sentence though. Why change your other passwords, UNLESS your Gawker password was your email password too? After 19 years on the Internet, I have a lot of logins.
OpenID ain't looking too bad now, is it?
Well hey, cut them a little slack. They shouldn't have to account for the computer security diaspora.
[deleted]
Preparing, negotiating, and generally trying to avoid this may be what's taking the longest.
FWIW, my password reset email was sent via Gawker side-project kinja.com. Curious.
FWIW, my password reset email was sent via Gawker side-project kinja.com. Curious.
That is a very good question, I am sure Gawker has its hands full trying to fix their leak and make sure that all its employees change their PW first.
Jesus. I just happened to check the reset password with my email address and found out that I do have an account. I have no idea what my password was, now I have to reset everything just to be safe.
I did the same thing -- so I went and d/l'ed the torrent last night to find what my password had been.
What a weird world we live in.
What a weird world we live in.
The good thing is that the password is reset to a random string when you click "send password", so no further action is necessary if you don't read Gawker anymore.
except now you can't tell if you used one of your "standard" passwords or not, so you have to reset your passwords on every web site you've ever used. Instead of "reset your password", try logging in with your standard passwords, and hope that nothing works.
True, and I'm finding myself trying to account for every site I've used the same email address. Impossible, thanks Gawker (and me).
It's unfortunate that they still have no way to delete your account, because I wanted to delete mine a year ago and I'm sure they would have a lot fewer emails to send out.
Not a total excuse, but they don't have email addresses for all their users (it wasn't a required field).
select * from users where email <> '' and email is not null
I assume you have never had to send email to hundreds of thousands of people with short notice. There are many ways to get banned in very short order. The typical route is to use a third party service, but they are almost without exception set up to not accept a large non opt-in list for immediate mailing.
Then why did I get a (spammy) warning from [email protected] last night?
It would seem to be possible for Gawker to notify their users more quickly.
It would seem to be possible for Gawker to notify their users more quickly.
Sorry for the spam. Truly not our intentions. We've already deleted the email addresses from our database.
my apologies for the sharp rhetoric, i only meant to say that SOMEone was able to get the notice out right quick. i think it's great that you guys did that, seriously, but i think it was a mistake to forget what the click?Hash idiom is typically used for.
and really, your actions kinda put a lie to gawker's sloth, so extra props for that.
and really, your actions kinda put a lie to gawker's sloth, so extra props for that.
I got a notice from teamhint, very pleased as I wasn't sure which email I used for posting to Gawker/Valleywag. I then changed my main logins under that email.
Does anyone even know what hint.io does?
The links in their "Your account has been compromised" lead me to a login page for the beta site, which of course I don't have an account for.
Very odd to advertise for a site which then the "users" can't use.
The links in their "Your account has been compromised" lead me to a login page for the beta site, which of course I don't have an account for.
Very odd to advertise for a site which then the "users" can't use.
If Gawker needs help, they can let us know. We finished updating their users ~ 10 hours ago.
http://thenextweb.com/media/2010/12/13/digital-good-samarita...