67% don’t get enough positive feedback(blog.rypple.com)
blog.rypple.com
67% don’t get enough positive feedback
http://blog.rypple.com/2010/12/67-of-employees-get-too-little-positive-feedback/
5 comments
Do 100% of people deserve positive feedback?
I'm not against positive feedback or denying that it has positive benefits to employees, but the cynic in me just hears whining.
I'm not against positive feedback or denying that it has positive benefits to employees, but the cynic in me just hears whining.
"Do 100% of people deserve positive feedback?"
Yes.
If someone is working for you, and you have the ability to fire them, but don't, then they must be doing something right. That something deserves positive feedback.
Yes.
If someone is working for you, and you have the ability to fire them, but don't, then they must be doing something right. That something deserves positive feedback.
In theory, sure. There's a gray area where you're not quite content with the employee, but the employee is making some progress, so you may want to hold out. But surely in that case frequent feedback is a must (to guide the progress) so I guess your point stands.
And in many cases the manager doing the technical supervising isn't in charge of the hiring and the firing.
And in many cases the manager doing the technical supervising isn't in charge of the hiring and the firing.
The problem, in my experience, is that people will never hesitate to give you negative feedback if your performance is in any way mediocre, whereas doing good things is often rewarded by a deafening silence.
A little encouragement can inspire someone to do better.
Think of it this way: Giving positive feedback costs you nothing and makes someone happy!
I had a principal investigator running my lab who felt that she only had to encourage the Grad students & undergrad volunteers, since they were working for none/less money. Post-docs and Lab techs got paid, so that should be all the encouragement they need. As a lab tech, I was not happy there.
I had a principal investigator running my lab who felt that she only had to encourage the Grad students & undergrad volunteers, since they were working for none/less money. Post-docs and Lab techs got paid, so that should be all the encouragement they need. As a lab tech, I was not happy there.
You need both idealy
This is one of my reasons for starting a side project. Having people pay me money is very positive reinforcement as far as I'm concerned.
[deleted]
1. Clarity - ensure your team understands the end goal and what they are trying to achieve
2. Standards - ensure standards are set (standard for quality of work, behaviour etc)
3. Responsibility - give employees responsibility, trust and hold them accountable for their actions
4. Flexibility - give employees control over their work day, don't spoonfeed or straitjacket them
5. Recognition & Rewards - positive feedback etc
6. Teaming - ensure a team spirit is developed
As someone who has managed technial teams from 4 to 90 people, I've found these 6 factors are a pretty good guide. Most people focus on #5 and #6 when discussing how to have a productive team, but you seldom see #1 to #4 mentioned - they may be self-evident, but I've seen more teams suffer from the first four factors being absent or neglected than not.