News for the tz database(github.com)
github.com
News for the tz database
https://github.com/eggert/tz/blob/master/NEWS
13 comments
This is like catnip to me. There's a tiny little critical corner of the Internet where dedicated volunteers bust their tails to make sure they get the details excruciatingly correct.
It's also a useful reminder to never, ever attempt to do datetime math on your own. Always use a library! And if that library is buggy, submit patches but don't say "aww, I'll just do it myself".
It's also a useful reminder to never, ever attempt to do datetime math on your own. Always use a library! And if that library is buggy, submit patches but don't say "aww, I'll just do it myself".
And while we cherish the work of volunteers maintaining this database, let's not forget that this database was once the subject of a meritless lawsuit: https://www.eff.org/press/releases/eff-wins-protection-time-...
The statement from the accuser was refreshing though:
In a statement, Astrolabe said, "Astrolabe's lawsuit against Mr. Olson and Mr. Eggert was based on a flawed understanding of the law. We now recognize that historical facts are no one's property and, accordingly, are withdrawing our Complaint. We deeply regret the disruption that our lawsuit caused for the volunteers who maintain the TZ database, and for Internet users."
In a statement, Astrolabe said, "Astrolabe's lawsuit against Mr. Olson and Mr. Eggert was based on a flawed understanding of the law. We now recognize that historical facts are no one's property and, accordingly, are withdrawing our Complaint. We deeply regret the disruption that our lawsuit caused for the volunteers who maintain the TZ database, and for Internet users."
They're removing East Saskatchewan? That was my favourite nonsense time zone. They're right that it should have been "West Saskatchewan", but I suppose Saskatchewan on its own is enough for the province outside Lloydminster, and Lloydminster uses Alberta (Mountain) time anyways which makes a second Saskatchewan timezones redundant (for now).
Amazing work I take for granted. Thank you to all the maintainers and contributors!
>>> zic no longer outputs a dummy
transition at time -259 (before the Big Bang), as clients should
no longer need this to handle historical timestamps correctly.
Ok, when we consider events prior to the Big freaking Bang as historical, and have test code for it, then I feel we are in safe hands.
Keep up the good work folks :-)
Ok, when we consider events prior to the Big freaking Bang as historical, and have test code for it, then I feel we are in safe hands.
Keep up the good work folks :-)
Does every Docker container, snap, flatpack etc. need to be updated every time the tz database releases a new update? Do they?
It is not necessary. Various backend systems can store dates and times as UTC, or UTC + time zone offset, and these cover the most common use cases. You can use these formats to communicate with clients, and have clients do the conversion for you, for example, in a browser you can use Date.getTimezoneOffset. One good thing about this is that if the time zone data is incorrect on a client's device, there is a reasonable chance that the client's clock is also showing the wrong time anyway. Most client OSs are aggressively updated so this is mostly solved. The remaining problems are any systems that need to do calendrical math, for example, calendar programs.
In practice, however, people write bad date/time code often enough that it’s a problem. I was recently using a client library that was completely broken if the client’s system had a negative offset from UTC more than 1 hour.
At work we get emails if we leave any container running that was built too long ago (three months or something?)
In practice, however, people write bad date/time code often enough that it’s a problem. I was recently using a client library that was completely broken if the client’s system had a negative offset from UTC more than 1 hour.
At work we get emails if we leave any container running that was built too long ago (three months or something?)
On my fleet I simply bind-mount /etc/timezone and /etc/localtime from the host (the latter sourced from /usr/share/zoneinfo/Europe/Berlin).
Biggest benefit: the timestamps in logfiles are actually correct and make sense.
Biggest benefit: the timestamps in logfiles are actually correct and make sense.
Isn't the idea behind containers that they only persist for a few days in any case, before being rebuilt?
Reading through this just underscores how ridiculous it is that UTC itself has leap seconds. The mapping between the clock and our labeling of the clock varies so often, who cares about whether the underlying clock matches the Sun to the nearest second at a physical location that few of us will ever visit?
Can we interest you in International Atomic Time? It is, after all, the Atomic Age. And the tz database does have "right" timezones.
* http://cr.yp.to/libtai/tai64.html
* http://cr.yp.to/libtai/tai64.html
It isn't clear why Ireland would need a negative DST? Don't they also "spring forward and fall back"?
In the Summer they call their time "Irish Standard Time", which indicates that they view the summer offset as the standard one and they are using "winter time" [1]. It's just a matter of perspective.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Winter_time_(clock_lag)
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Winter_time_(clock_lag)
> Use "PST" and "PDT" for Philippine time.
I wonder if this will break anything. Some systems make the bad assumption that timezone abbreviations are unique, e.g. when parsing dates.
I wonder if this will break anything. Some systems make the bad assumption that timezone abbreviations are unique, e.g. when parsing dates.
And the "changes to past timestamps" is why you can't even store past events using Olson timezone names like America/Los_Angeles: you have to use UTC and/or timezone offsets like -0700.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tz_database https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10032498
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tz_database https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10032498
Is it not the opposite, though? If you need to store the fact that an important meeting took place in Los Angeles at exactly 4.00pm on a specific date, if you had used utc/offsets, it would look like the meeting took place at 3.59.50pm or whatever change was done to correct the tz data for historical timezones?
A timestamp should not be used to record location.
It really depends on the use-case. If you had a meeting at a specific wall-time you'll want the timestamp to change. If you recorded a timestamp for when something happened, the local time should change.
But you should under no circumstances record the offset. Record either a timestamp or local time + location.
But you should under no circumstances record the offset. Record either a timestamp or local time + location.
I agree that systems should record times in UTC. But I'm talking about a more nuanced edge case: parsing user-entered date strings. If a user says "4pm Los Angeles", it could be ambiguous, and recording the offset is the only way to reliably disambiguate. See my reply above.
As an extreme example, imagine everyone thought daylight saving was going to happen on March 11.
But at the last minute, the government announces it's happening on March 4. And your systems haven't yet been updated to reflect this.
So humans move their clocks forward one hour on March 4.
You write somewhere in a text field "March 4 4pm".
"March 4 4pm America/Los_Angeles" doesn't help you, because it's not clear whether you thought "America/Los_Angeles" was -0800 or -0700. And it's not clear whether the system interpreting that date agrees with you.
To be unambiguous, you need to say "March 4 4pm -0700". Otherwise the system might assume the effective timezone is -0800, per the rules it knows. Without unambiguous input, correctly parsing such times is impossible.
You could also use Olson timezones for past events, but then you'd also have to record which version of the timezone rules you were using. And of course nobody does that because it's overcomplicated and unnecessary.
You're right that converting back to 4pm for display is problematic. The simplest solution is to always display UTC. But if you want to convert to the user's preferred timezone, during this time, yes, the system would display 3pm until it got the updated timezone rules. There are more complex solutions, but for most use cases just displaying "March 4 3pm -0800" would be adequate.
But at the last minute, the government announces it's happening on March 4. And your systems haven't yet been updated to reflect this.
So humans move their clocks forward one hour on March 4.
You write somewhere in a text field "March 4 4pm".
"March 4 4pm America/Los_Angeles" doesn't help you, because it's not clear whether you thought "America/Los_Angeles" was -0800 or -0700. And it's not clear whether the system interpreting that date agrees with you.
To be unambiguous, you need to say "March 4 4pm -0700". Otherwise the system might assume the effective timezone is -0800, per the rules it knows. Without unambiguous input, correctly parsing such times is impossible.
You could also use Olson timezones for past events, but then you'd also have to record which version of the timezone rules you were using. And of course nobody does that because it's overcomplicated and unnecessary.
You're right that converting back to 4pm for display is problematic. The simplest solution is to always display UTC. But if you want to convert to the user's preferred timezone, during this time, yes, the system would display 3pm until it got the updated timezone rules. There are more complex solutions, but for most use cases just displaying "March 4 3pm -0800" would be adequate.
There were already many duplicate abbreviations, so this isn't a new problem, and as you said, is a bad assumption, those systems would likely already be incorrect. I would guess systems using abbreviations like this presumably are using POSIX timezones, which isn't going to be historically correct, but require defining all the information about the abbreviation/zone anyway (i.e. they are basically made up timezones, so it shouldn't matter).
> Use "PST" and "PDT" for Philippine time.
What about us in Pacific daylight time? Now our timezone acronym is ambiguous.
What about us in Pacific daylight time? Now our timezone acronym is ambiguous.
Time (handling) sucks.
You should try non terrestrial software dev where time dilation has to be accounted for.
You linked to a copy embedded in pytz.
Upstream database is here:
https://github.com/eggert/tz
Upstream database is here:
https://github.com/eggert/tz
Thanks, we've updated the link from https://github.com/stub42/pytz/blob/master/tz/NEWS.
https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/tz/2018-July/thread.html
The amount of effort and detail that goes into this database is astonishing - every few days there's a new twist introduced by timezone legislation somewhere around the world.
Even more impressive is their dedication to building a correct database of historic timezone changes - here's a post where someone submitted further details on the history of time in Macau for example: https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/tz/2018-May/026467.html