Performance comparison: Rails 1.2.6 vs 2.0.2(izumi.plan99.net)
izumi.plan99.net
Performance comparison: Rails 1.2.6 vs 2.0.2
http://izumi.plan99.net/blog/index.php/2008/03/18/performance-comparison-rails-126-vs-202/
4 comments
I swear I was searching for a post on this topic just last night.
nickb is a powerful discovery engine.
nickb is a powerful discovery engine.
http://weblog.rubyonrails.org/2008/3/18/comparing-rails-2-0-...
"Hongli Lai has compared a dummy scaffold application from Rails 1.2 to Rails 2.0 and found the latter to be 30-50% faster. That’s great to see.
But what I think is even more interesting is the progress we’ve been making on performance optimizations for more substantial applications. Rails 2.0 made a lot of progress for applications with lots of assets and for ones with big routes.rb files. The forthcoming Rails 2.1 will move things forward even further."
"Hongli Lai has compared a dummy scaffold application from Rails 1.2 to Rails 2.0 and found the latter to be 30-50% faster. That’s great to see.
But what I think is even more interesting is the progress we’ve been making on performance optimizations for more substantial applications. Rails 2.0 made a lot of progress for applications with lots of assets and for ones with big routes.rb files. The forthcoming Rails 2.1 will move things forward even further."
On a side note, what's up with the uhh...header image on the blog?