They seem to be saying that the absence of rare earth metals makes the overall lifecycle carbon emissions be 40% lower than those that do use these metals. It does not seem to be related to the efficiency of the motor per se.
You don't need to go through everything to form an opinion. I bet they're only interested in a couple of specific points, and not a full review of every single line.
Even if browsers did this, you can still execute this attack. As long as not all of your users know what the expected behavior is, you can trick them with a fake UI as long as it looks believable.
Well see you were just optimizing for the wrong things. You thought avoiding wet was the thing to optimize for, but now, with experience, you find other things are more important to you and you aim at optimizing those. What things are wrong and right vary by person and by purpose (and probably by time, too).
Hunted, a Dutch TV series, is a reality show featuring exactly this kind of investigative resources. A lot of times, the players (the hunted) are tracked down because they used some form of communication that is compromised by the hunters.
It's clean in the sense that it isn't generating CO2. But it is a finite resource. Also, the environmental impact of a nuclear power plant is non-negligible.
A self-respecting company doesn't let their customers just be stuck like that. While fixing the issue may not be feasible, there's usually a workaround that the company can help their customers find or implement. But then again, not every company lives up to these expectations.
It's really hard to fight this though, because it may take many years, even decades, to thoroughly answer a follow-up question. By then, everyone has forgotten about the original reason something got published.
Yes, and please make the website one that actually works on mobile.
In some restaurants, I've seen the QR code go to a full-page PDF version of the menu. Like, thanks, but I can't read that on a mobile device.