It's actually not easy; not every place has facilities for that. Wife is a nurse, and we went through this discussion of the best process when she was an ICU nurse during the Ebola scare five years ago.
Remember too, sometimes folks are on the way to work in their scrubs, not necessarily leaving work.
They should report these unsafe working conditions to OSHA. Hospitals are required to have a plan for this, and certain actions are specifically called out as potentially riskier. Seems like if you've notified the administration of the risk, and notified OSHA you can stop work until the dangerous work environment is resolved. Findlaw and OHSA article on respiratory programs below.
Under federal and state laws, employers must provide a safe workplace. If unsafe working conditions are present, a worker may report the violation to the employer, to the federal and/or state Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), and in some cases, the worker may refuse to work. The following is a summary of OSHA protection and guidelines for dealing with dangerous conditions in the workplace.
What to Do When a Safety Hazard Poses an Imminent Danger
When unsafe working conditions place the life of a worker in imminent danger, the worker should report the dangerous condition to OSHA. The worker also has the right to refuse to work if:
There is a reasonable and good faith belief that a condition in the workplace poses an immediate and substantial risk of serious physical injury or death;
"Men don't have the same issues of unpractical clothing and being judged on their appearance"
There's research to indicate that attractive men make more than unattractive men, and the variance is greater than with women:
"Results indicated that more attractive men had higher starting salaries and they continued to earn more over time. For women, there was no effect of attractiveness for starting salaries, but more attractive women earned more later on in their jobs."
I’m using my Pavlok to break old bad habits and remind myself to do new things (but not both at once). A few shocks really gets my monkey mind to alter it’s behavior...
Important to remember that monetization of her content is under the Partner Program Agreement. They've left some wiggle room in that part, but not much.
"Advertising Revenues. YouTube will pay you 55% of net revenues recognized by YouTube from ads displayed or streamed by YouTube or an authorized third party on your Content watch pages or in or on the YouTube video player in conjunction with the streaming of your Content. YouTube is not obligated to display any advertisements alongside your videos and may determine the type and format of ads available on the YouTube Service. For clarity, YouTube reserves the right to retain all other revenues derived from the YouTube service, including any revenues relating to ads on search result pages."
I like this idea, but I think there are probably two things that are an issue with this:
1 - You remove control of the company from being able to plausibly deny that something happened; you become a second subpeonable party that would disclose something if forced to.
2 - You're not pricing it high enough for a big reseller (like CDW, etc) to want to try to sell it.
Not sure how to fix #1 besides selling/licensing the tech (if the patent issues) to a larger company that can roll this into a larger offering (and out to their exiting customers).
Background; I've worked in Enterprise Software Sales and as part of a SaaS Operations Team.