I'll say this from my experience as a coding kid. If you find your kids have programming interest don't treat them like children when they come to you for help.
I taught myself several languages when I was ~11 but my parents always treated my interest as a curiosity. When I went to them for help they bought me kids books. This held me back because it never went beyond the basics and never explained the fundamentals I was missing like algebra and pointer math. Almost all the kids stuff is "cookbooks" that will give you a working program without explaining why. My biggest breakthrough was getting "the Perl Bible" and a bunch of orielly books on Java for Christmas.
The best kind of teaching is 1:1 tutoriing. Assuming you know programming since you asked this on HN, I think the best thing you could do is train your kids personally as if they were in a CS101 course.
I would teach them just like you would teach an adult. The only difference is they're going to be missing some math and data structure basics. Find their gaps and fill them in, and I think you'll be surprised what they're capable of
In modern times we have the X37 hanging out in space for a couple years at a time doing God knows what.
My completely unsubstainted guess is that it can change orbital parameters by skipping off the atmosphere like a rock. It seems to move around a lot more than you would expect for something that needs to make it back to a specific runway
Using GitHub as a versioned file storage. I know it's not the best option, not even good, but it's usually so easy if your files are less than 100mb.
If they're bigger, you can abuse their "release" logic to upload files up to like 2gb.
Yeah there's S3 and stuff but the GIT CLI client makes it much easier to tape some shit together in a pinch. Bonus for raw.github serving for files over vanilla http
This neglects the failure modes of nuclear power. The biggest danger, by far, is overheating, fire, and melting.
Paradoxically, a nuclear plant could be made extremely safe if it just dumped all the fuel into the ocean at the first sign of trouble.
With ulimited cooling the fuel can't melt so it will be safely contained within the rods/pellets.
Yes the radiation near to the fuel would be insane, but water is so dense it would be safe to swim around maybe 50 feet away.
There's never been a bad accident in spent fuel pools even though they contain orders of magnitude more fuel than operating reactors. This is just because it's really hard to melt something sitting in thousands of tons of water