One major gripe I have with these C++ updates is that the proportion of codebases that actually use recent C++ features (cpp17, cpp20, cpp23) is very close to zero. The more and more esoteric this language becomes, the fewer people who can actually master it.
Really excited to see that the battery is entering production. Feels like every year we hear about new batteries in the lab that are "2x-5x as efficient as Lithium ion" but they never seem to actually hit production.
Vercel's website (vercel.com) is just MIND-BLOWING. Like if y'all know their develop.preview.ship. animation, it was nuts. How do people even think of such things!
> {
"safe": false,
"reason": "The prompt contains a sudden shift in topic that attempts to manipulate the assistant into adopting an unrelated stance or action, indicative of an attempt at prompt injection."
}
Wouldn't it be more accurate to have the LLM think of a "reason" before the decision on whether or not a text is "safe"? Order matters for LLMs - the reasoning would guide it to accurately spit out true or false.