I asked what you did. Then asked if drupals security was phps fault.
Are you seriously this butthurt about a function name, look up where the name came from originally. I also wonder what magical perfect language you use, dont tell me its php...
Not sure where you're going with the rest of this comment so I wont entertain that part. whew...
What are you getting out of this? He worked on php and look how far it came, what have you done?
Your own website was written in php which you took down due to a security vulnerability in a framework... now is it php fault that someone wrote vulnerable code?
"Temporarily offline due to Drupal security vulnerability."
The app its self is the weakness not the protocol. But also the article says "that exploited a flaw in WhatsApp-owned servers to help clients hack into the cellphones".
What defines precious cargo? Satellites and astronauts seem to do alright going into space attached to a giant rocket, but I will admit I'm not well versed on the forces created from a electromagnetic launcher.
Correct, the endpoints are the weakness. My point was about being more difficult to find and not bringing attention by paying for a vpn service, a vps could be anything.
Well if you are really after anonymity, you have to also keep in mind your isp and browser fingerprinting and the million other things that can expose you online. :)
Well like others have said before, the company most likely wont go down in flames in order to protect you. Not all, but I assume the major providers will roll over.
Simply layers obscurity, it would be harder to subpoena multiple companies than a single vpn service. (Plus you "own" the vps and can quickly delete or create new services whenever) Before you browse, create a new vpn box, browse..., then delete the box after use. What logs, what box?
When the vpn company is subpoenaed because someone saw suspicious traffic coming out of their servers, regardless of the number of people, the logs and connections would point directly to you.
I have no side, I was looking at things objectively and pointing out that corporate media spreads disinformation as well, there are plenty of entities that spread it, including foreign. But we shouldn't allow government agencies to further reduce internet freedoms because someone anonymous posts a bunch of bullshit...
How typical posting in a controversial thread, get upvoted then downvoted and flagged, silencing my thoughts on the subject. I said there were other forms of mass disinformation that should be addressed too and that people should think for themselves, not let large entities suppress freedoms on the internet.
Here we go again, the downvotes started.
So corporate media can spew out disinformation for years without consequences but when someone anonymous online spreads disinformation it warrants the fbis involvement to deem it national security?
Where does it stop, sounds like suppression of freedom of speech and thought, attempting to steer the narrative.
Someone who downvoted me and flagged me, please tell me where I'm wrong with what I said?
Are you seriously this butthurt about a function name, look up where the name came from originally. I also wonder what magical perfect language you use, dont tell me its php...
Not sure where you're going with the rest of this comment so I wont entertain that part. whew...