Shall we be concerned that not many are even able to read assembler code?
I'm not talking about reading machine code, produced by the assembler, but the assembler code itself.
Machine code was hard, but one could make it pretty efficient. Not efficiently.
Assembler was still pretty performant, for today's standard it is tip top.
So, moving on 10, 20 years from now, can someone read c++? Even html?
All have its space.
Small team, do monolith or you'll stop moving.
Big teams, be wary of Conway's law, and don't fight it, probably some services will emerge.
Similar with forgejo.
I mirrored all gh then flipped the ones I was using the most.
The biggest win was on running apple runners in my mac, so the free gh actions can do other stuff.
The catalan MEPs also were targeted with Pegasus, and I don't remember the details but at that time the only client were nation states, so Spain was the one to hire the service. Nothing happened.
Outlook eats Gmail for breakfast.
The way shared accounts, lists, and work assignments are done in Outlook require their backend (share point inheritance), and google drive is pretty good even for some small files, but when all is considered O365 wins.
Then if you are in Europe, you should not use any of those and other very good solutions are currently growing super fast.
I'm currently working on a tui which includes photorec and foremost among others.
I have also created my first dockerhub image, as the plan is to run it as container on top of a zfs in Truenas.
I'm basically on a hunt for all data, I have 7 disks and some USB that I have imaged and I need to get data out, and I will need to organised all that data (this part is still a work in progress), ideas welcomed.